tests-maintenance
Maintain IdeaVim Tests with Focused Reviews
Disabled tests and unclear exclusions can hide regressions and weaken test quality. This skill reviews one focused area and produces documented, reviewable maintenance changes.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "tests-maintenance" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "tests-maintenance". Review one disabled motion test.
Expected outcome:
Reviewed DeleteMotionTest. The targeted test passed consistently after the referenced fix, so the disabled annotation was removed with a focused explanation.
Using "tests-maintenance". Check one vague Neovim exclusion.
Expected outcome:
The exclusion reflects an IntelliJ editor offset difference. The reason was updated and a description now explains the observed behavior.
Using "tests-maintenance". Improve readability in one test file.
Expected outcome:
Replaced meaningless fixture text with a realistic Kotlin example. Assertions and production code were unchanged.
Security Audit
SafeAll 76 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, documented local test commands, or ordinary review wording. The skill contains no prompt injection, exfiltration intent, covert network access, or unsafe command construction.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (50)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
JetBrains. (2026). tests-maintenance security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance/audits/8BibTeX citation
@techreport{jetbrains-jetbrains-tests-maintenance-2026,
author = {JetBrains},
title = {tests-maintenance security audit report (audit version 8)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {8},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance/audits/8},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "tests-maintenance security audit report (audit version 8)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "JetBrains"
date-released: "2026-07-23"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jetbrains-tests-maintenance/audits/8"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:jetbrains-tests-maintenance:audit:8"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Recheck Disabled Tests
Run one disabled test, investigate its history, and re-enable it only when the result is stable and explained.
Document Neovim Exclusions
Replace vague exclusion reasons with specific categories and descriptions supported by test results or repository evidence.
Improve Test Readability
Replace meaningless fixture text and clarify test names while preserving the tested behavior.
Try These Prompts
Find one disabled IdeaVim test, run it, and report whether it can be re-enabled. Explain the evidence and keep changes limited to that test.
Review one TestWithoutNeovim annotation. Verify the reason, run the test with Neovim when possible, and add a specific description if needed.
Inspect one IdeaVim test file for unclear names or meaningless content. Make one logical readability improvement without changing production behavior.
Choose one DIFFERENT or UNCLEAR exclusion. Test with Neovim, inspect relevant history, classify the cause, and prepare a focused pull request summary.
Best Practices
- Keep each run and pull request limited to one logical test maintenance change.
- Verify Neovim mode is active before drawing conclusions from compatibility test results.
- Use test output, history, comments, or platform documentation to justify exclusion reasons.
Avoid
- Do not combine unrelated annotation, content, and disabled-test changes in one pull request.
- Do not classify intentional behavior differences from assumptions without supporting evidence.
- Do not expand maintenance work into production fixes, new features, or major refactoring.