Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-7F5FD6A1

6/30/2026, 4:03:33 AM

golang-pro security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
golang-pro
Version
v2
Maintainer
jeffallan
Source
github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/golang-pro/
Coverage
6 Files scanned · 2,221 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported many command, script, network, filesystem, and environment patterns, but review found them inside markdown reference examples. No runnable skill code, prompt injection attempt, credential exfiltration, or hidden malicious behavior was found. The remaining risk is low because users may copy operational command examples into their own projects.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

6 Files scanned · 2,221 Lines analyzed

5 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Observed in 9 evidence locations

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 2 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Observed in 1 evidence location

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 148 evidence locations

Capability review items (5)
Low
references/concurrency.md:5-13references/generics.md:436-441references/testing.md:442-450SKILL.md:47-51
Markdown Backticks Flagged as Command Execution
The analyzer treated markdown fences and inline command text as executable Ruby or shell backticks. These locations are documentation examples, not skill runtime code.
The cited lines are markdown code fences, tables, or inline examples. I found no executable script wrapper or instruction to run hidden commands.
Low
references/concurrency.md:8-13references/interfaces.md:79-82references/project-structure.md:424-429references/testing.md:339-343
Go Import Blocks Flagged as Dynamic Imports
Static script findings point to Go import blocks in reference snippets. They do not load code dynamically in the skill environment.
The syntax is ordinary Go sample code embedded in markdown. There is no JavaScript import expression or variable-based module loader.
Low
references/project-structure.md:243-317references/project-structure.md:382-386references/testing.md:440-450
Build Command Examples Require User Judgment
The references include Makefile, go test, go generate, Docker, and profiling examples. They are legitimate Go workflow documentation, but users should inspect commands before copying them.
The commands are normal Go build and test examples, not hidden automation. Some commands can affect local files if copied into a project, so a low-risk warning is appropriate.
Low
SKILL.md:6references/interfaces.md:270references/project-structure.md:438
Network Indicators Are Documentation Examples
The hardcoded URL and host values are a repository metadata URL and sample server addresses. They do not indicate outbound network behavior by the skill.
The cited URL is author metadata, and the host values are sample configuration defaults. No code sends data to those locations.
Low
references/interfaces.md:283-285references/project-structure.md:150-152references/project-structure.md:397references/testing.md:78SKILL.md:66
System Reconnaissance Alerts Are Identifier Examples
The system reconnaissance alerts point to ordinary Go sample identifiers and test data. They do not inspect the host system or gather environment details.
The cited lines are interface methods, user test fixtures, or section text. I found no commands such as uname, whoami, env dumping, or host enumeration.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (2)
Low
references/project-structure.md:58references/project-structure.md:392references/project-structure.md:445references/project-structure.md:452
Example Paths and Environment Names Are Not Exfiltration
Relative paths and environment variable names appear in module and configuration examples. They demonstrate Go project layout and envconfig usage, not secret harvesting or traversal.
The path and environment references are inside isolated examples. I found no network sink, file reader, or instruction that collects secrets.
Low
SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:30SKILL.md:36SKILL.md:48references/interfaces.md:1references/project-structure.md:392references/project-structure.md:468references/testing.md:440
Weak Crypto Alerts Are False Positives
The cited weak-cryptography locations do not contain cryptographic algorithms. They are headings, markdown examples, or Go project tooling text.
Search did not find md5, sha1, or similar cryptographic code in the reviewed content. The static hits appear to be substring or markdown-context errors.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable