Skills interface-review

📦

interface-review

Name: interface-review
Author: jakubkrehel

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands📁 Filesystem access

Review Interface Changes with Clear Evidence

Interface changes can introduce visual, accessibility, and content regressions across connected surfaces. This skill resolves the change scope and produces evidence-based findings with clear status labels.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "interface-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/lockfile

Test it

Using "interface-review". Review the current branch and include uncommitted interface changes.

Expected outcome:

Scope: seven commits and two uncommitted files against the default branch.
Coverage: twelve files after exclusions, with two affected surfaces reviewed.
Finding: a dialog lost its accessible name in this change. Status: Regression. Severity: High.
Verdict: Block until the accessible name is restored.

Using "interface-review". Review pull request 482 for interface issues.

Expected outcome:

Scope: the fetched pull request head compared with its merge base.
Coverage: no interface evidence was found in excluded generated files.
No actionable interface findings were introduced or regressed.
Verdict: Approve.

Security Audit

Safe

v1 • 9/4/2026 Open versioned report

All 44 static findings are false positives. The external-command alerts mistake Markdown formatting and examples for Ruby execution; the other alerts describe bounded review scope or isolated worktree use. No evidence of prompt injection, exfiltration intent, destructive behavior, or other semantic security issues was found.

Files scanned

289

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

jakubkrehel. (2026). interface-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1

BibTeX citation

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-interface-review-2026,
  author = {jakubkrehel},
  title = {interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jakubkrehel"
date-released: "2026-09-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-interface-review:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium

Architecture

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Review a feature branch

Check interface changes across the branch and local edits before opening a pull request.

Assess a pull request

Resolve the pull request ref, inspect affected surfaces, and identify interface regressions.

Verify accessibility changes

Inspect removed semantics, focus behavior, labels, and motion preferences within the selected change.

Try These Prompts

Review my current changes

Review the current interface changes. Resolve the default scope and report only introduced or regressed interface issues.

Review a pull request

Review pull request 482 for interface regressions. Include the resolved scope, affected surfaces, exclusions, coverage, and status for each finding.

Review an explicit range

Review release..feature as written. Check removed lines, expand affected consumers, and separate introduced, regressed, and pre-existing findings.

Audit a shared design token change

Review this design token change across two consumer hops. Prioritize rendered entry points, explain coverage limits, and verify each claimed regression against the base.

Best Practices

Name the target explicitly when you need a pull request, ref, branch, or range reviewed.
Provide the change intent so missing states and incomplete behavior can be evaluated.
Request rendered verification when findings depend on runtime behavior or visual output.

Avoid

Do not use this skill as a whole-repository audit without routing directly to better-interface.
Do not treat pre-existing issues as failures caused by the current change.
Do not assume runtime or visual behavior was verified when the report marks it unverified.

Frequently Asked Questions

What change targets are supported?

The skill supports working, staged, branch, pull request, bare ref, and explicit two-dot or three-dot ranges.

Does it modify my working tree?

No. Reviews are read-only, and pull request refs are fetched without checkout.

How are affected surfaces selected?

The skill expands direct consumers by default and may expand two hops for shared primitives, themes, and design tokens.

Does it review every consumer?

No. It reviews at most five consumers and reports how many were not expanded.

Can it perform visual verification?

Yes, when requested or when the project provides a cheap preview. Otherwise, visual and runtime claims remain unverified.

Does it review security and performance?

No. It names those concerns once and directs them to the project general code review.

Developer Details

Author

jakubkrehel

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/jakubkrehel/skills/tree/267330e1adfc66a718fb65fa6918c1f06d0a689e/skills/interface-review

Ref

096c7daa4d0d974771dad12d81c3d0d4688617b9

Maintenance freshness

9/8/2026

Usage

0 downloads · 0 views

File structure

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 removed-signals.md

📄 scope-resolution.md

📄 SKILL.md