Audit History
agent-browser - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Aug 6, 2026, 11:32 AM | 5 confirmed | 3 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 6, 2026, 02:34 PM | 3 confirmed | 45 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 02:34 PM | 3 confirmed | 45 | Contains scripts |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 04:25 AM | 2 confirmed | 5 | Contains scripts |
| v1 | Apr 29, 2026, 08:55 AM | 1 confirmed | 2 | Baseline |
Aug 6, 2026, 11:32 AM
Most static hits are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, fenced shell examples, placeholder URLs, relative links, and /dev/null redirection. Confirmed risks include external installation, remote image loading, TOTP exposure through process arguments, and remote screen capture. Credential submission, cookie extraction, local file upload, and page JavaScript require explicit consent and strict scoping.
Confirmed security concerns (5)
Capability review items (3)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (50)
🌐 Network access (50)
📁 Filesystem access (17)
Detected Patterns
Jul 6, 2026, 02:34 PM
Most static shell and URL findings are Markdown examples or expected CLI workflow. The skill still exposes high-risk capabilities: remote browser control, screen or video capture, JavaScript execution, file upload, proxy routing, and authenticated session handling. The documentation also contains rate-limit avoidance and cookie extraction guidance that should be removed before publication.
Confirmed security concerns (3)
Capability review items (45)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (163)
🌐 Network access (54)
📁 Filesystem access (15)
Detected Patterns
Jul 6, 2026, 02:34 PM
Most static shell and URL findings are Markdown examples or expected CLI workflow. The skill still exposes high-risk capabilities: remote browser control, screen or video capture, JavaScript execution, file upload, proxy routing, and authenticated session handling. The documentation also contains rate-limit avoidance and cookie extraction guidance that should be removed before publication.
Confirmed security concerns (3)
Capability review items (45)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (163)
🌐 Network access (54)
📁 Filesystem access (15)
Detected Patterns
Jun 30, 2026, 04:25 AM
Static command findings are mostly Markdown examples and expected shell templates, not hidden execution. However, the skill intentionally enables remote browser navigation, proxy routing, file upload, screenshots, video recording, JavaScript execution, and authenticated-session handling. Publication should require revisions that remove abuse-oriented proxy guidance, cookie extraction examples, and clearer consent controls.
Confirmed security concerns (2)
Capability review items (5)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚡ Contains scripts (3)
⚙️ External commands (3)
🌐 Network access (4)
Detected Patterns
Apr 29, 2026, 08:55 AM
Static analysis detected 606 potential security issues, primarily shell command patterns in documentation files. After evaluation, all findings are FALSE POSITIVES or informational. The skill is a legitimate browser automation tool that uses the belt CLI to control Playwright. Shell commands are documented usage examples, not execution vulnerabilities. Browser credential access and session state are expected behavior for this tool type.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Static false positives ignored (1)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.