Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-E941FB96

6/30/2026, 4:30:20 AM

vet security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
vet
Version
v2
Maintainer
imbue-ai
Coverage
4 Files scanned · 269 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static weak-cryptography findings are false positives; the cited lines contain descriptions, command examples, or argument parsing, not cryptographic operations. The confirmed risks are intentional external command execution and reading local assistant session history from hidden directories, which are legitimate for this skill but require user awareness.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

4 Files scanned · 269 Lines analyzed

4 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 5 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Capability review items (4)
Medium
External Review Tool Execution
The skill instructs agents to install and run the verify-everything vet command, including history-loader commands. This is expected behavior for the skill, but it executes local commands and depends on an external package.
The command examples are explicit and central to the skill workflow. The risk is medium because the commands are documented review operations, not hidden or obfuscated execution.
Medium
Local Conversation History Access
The skill directs agents to read Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode session files from hidden local directories and pass the extracted history to vet. This can expose sensitive prompts, code, or credentials contained in prior conversation history.
The file paths and loader scripts directly read local assistant history files. The behavior is intentional and useful, but the privacy impact is clear.
Low
Unvalidated OpenCode Session Identifier
The OpenCode export script uses the provided session identifier to build local paths without validating that it matches the expected ses_ format. This could read unexpected local JSON files if an untrusted session identifier is supplied.
The script does not validate the session-id value before path construction. Exploitability appears limited because the script reads local JSON files and requires local command invocation.
Low
Local Session Discovery Commands
The documentation recommends grep-based discovery of session files in OpenCode storage. This is local reconnaissance for a stated workflow, but it can reveal where conversation records are stored.
The local discovery behavior is explicitly documented and has a legitimate purpose. It remains a low privacy concern because it searches assistant storage directories.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (1)
Low
Static Weak-Cryptography Findings Dismissed
The reported weak-cryptography locations do not contain cryptographic operations. They are descriptions, argument parser declarations, or documentation text, so these scanner hits are false positives.
Manual review found no hashing, encryption, cipher selection, or cryptographic API use at the cited locations. The static pattern appears to match unrelated text.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable