Audit History
specs-creator - 8 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v8 Latest | Jul 9, 2026, 09:00 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v7 | Jul 9, 2026, 09:00 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v6 | Jul 9, 2026, 04:08 AM | No confirmed findings | 1 | No capability change |
| v5 | Jul 5, 2026, 03:32 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 5, 2026, 03:32 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Contains scriptsFilesystem access |
| v3 | Jun 30, 2026, 12:29 AM | No confirmed findings | 4 | Contains scriptsFilesystem accessExternal commandsEnv variables |
| v2 | Jan 23, 2026, 02:18 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Jan 23, 2026, 02:29 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 9, 2026, 09:00 AM
All static findings were false positives after context review. The warnings match Markdown formatting, validation-script keywords, and template examples rather than shell execution, secret access, reconnaissance, or malware behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (11)
🔑 Env variables (4)
Jul 9, 2026, 09:00 AM
All static findings were false positives after context review. The warnings match Markdown formatting, validation-script keywords, and template examples rather than shell execution, secret access, reconnaissance, or malware behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (11)
🔑 Env variables (4)
Jul 9, 2026, 04:08 AM
Most static findings are false positives from markdown formatting, placeholder template examples, and validation code. One medium-risk finding remains because the skill instructs agents to run bundled community validation scripts, which creates external command execution risk despite the scripts appearing purpose-built for local spec checks.
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (11)
🔑 Env variables (4)
Jul 5, 2026, 03:32 PM
All reviewed static findings are false positives based on file context. The matches are markdown formatting, template placeholders, defensive validation code, or incident response examples.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (11)
🔑 Env variables (4)
Jul 5, 2026, 03:32 PM
All reviewed static findings are false positives based on file context. The matches are markdown formatting, template placeholders, defensive validation code, or incident response examples.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (11)
🔑 Env variables (4)
Jun 30, 2026, 12:29 AM
Static analysis reported 241 issues and a 100/100 risk score, but review found the high and critical alerts are mostly keyword false positives in templates and validators. No prompt injection, network exfiltration, credential theft, destructive behavior, or confirmed malicious intent was found. The real risk is that the skill writes local spec files and asks agents to run bundled Python validation scripts, so it should publish with a filesystem and script execution warning.
Capability review items (4)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Static false positives ignored (1)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚡ Contains scripts (3)
📁 Filesystem access (5)
⚙️ External commands (5)
🔑 Env variables (1)
Detected Patterns
Jan 23, 2026, 02:18 AM
Documentation generation skill with no security concerns. All 241 static findings are false positives triggered by pattern matching in markdown templates and documentation files. The skill contains Python validation scripts and markdown templates for specification creation. No actual code execution, sensitive data access, or malicious patterns present.
Jan 23, 2026, 02:29 AM
All 161 static findings evaluated as false positives. The skill consists of documentation, templates, and validation scripts for specification creation. No malicious code patterns, command injection vectors, or credential exfiltration detected. The flagged backticks are markdown code formatting, not shell execution. References to cryptographic terms are standard industry practices in documentation examples.