📦

Audit History

condition-based-waiting - 10 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v10 LatestJul 9, 2026, 04:24 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v9 Jul 9, 2026, 04:24 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v8 Jul 6, 2026, 11:47 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v7 Jul 6, 2026, 11:47 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v6 Jun 29, 2026, 09:22 PM No confirmed findings1 External commands
v5 Jan 17, 2026, 05:21 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 05:21 AM No confirmed findings0External commandsFilesystem access
v3 Jan 10, 2026, 01:37 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jan 10, 2026, 01:37 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 10, 2026, 01:37 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 9, 2026, 04:24 AM

The apparent external command findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks and TypeScript template literals in examples. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, or malicious execution intent was found in the reviewed text files, but the bundled SKILL.zip remains an unscanned artifact that should be reviewed before publication.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jul 9, 2026, 04:24 AM

The apparent external command findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks and TypeScript template literals in examples. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, or malicious execution intent was found in the reviewed text files, but the bundled SKILL.zip remains an unscanned artifact that should be reviewed before publication.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jul 6, 2026, 11:47 AM

No malicious behavior, prompt injection, or true command execution was found. The backtick findings are Markdown fences, inline code, or TypeScript template literals used in examples. The archive was manually checked and contains only a duplicate SKILL.md matching the source file.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 6, 2026, 11:47 AM

No malicious behavior, prompt injection, or true command execution was found. The backtick findings are Markdown fences, inline code, or TypeScript template literals used in examples. The archive was manually checked and contains only a duplicate SKILL.md matching the source file.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 29, 2026, 09:22 PM

The static command-execution and weak-crypto findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, timeout strings, and ordinary parameter names. No prompt injection, network access, secret access, malware behavior, or actual shell execution was found. A low-risk filesystem polling example appears in documentation and should be used only with bounded timeouts.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
2
False positives ignored
Capability review items (1)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Low
Documentation Mentions Filesystem Polling
The skill includes a wait-for-file example using a filesystem existence check. This is a legitimate testing pattern, but consumers should avoid unbounded polling and sensitive paths.
The filesystem access appears only as a documentation example, not as executable package behavior. It is still a real capability suggestion that can touch local paths if copied into tests.
Static false positives ignored (2)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Static Command Execution Matches Are False Positives
The reported external command locations are Markdown code fences, inline examples, or TypeScript timeout messages. I found no shell execution, process spawning, or command interpolation.
The locations contain Markdown fences, documentation text, or Error template strings. No executable shell API or Ruby backtick execution is present in the reviewed files.
Low
Static Blocker Matches Are False Positives
The weak cryptography and reconnaissance labels do not match the file context. The cited lines describe test waiting, descriptions, IDs, or timeout handling, not cryptographic algorithms or system probing.
The surrounding code contains no hashing, encryption, host enumeration, or OS reconnaissance. The scanner appears to have matched benign substrings and documentation language.

Risk Factors

📁 Filesystem access (1)
Audited by: codex

Jan 17, 2026, 05:21 AM

Pure testing utility skill containing only TypeScript polling functions and documentation. All 43 static findings are false positives: JavaScript template literals were misidentified as Ruby shell execution, timing functions were misidentified as weak cryptography, and documentation comments were misidentified as system reconnaissance. No actual risk factors present.

3
Files scanned
465
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 05:21 AM

Pure testing utility skill containing only TypeScript polling functions and documentation. All 43 static findings are false positives: JavaScript template literals were misidentified as Ruby shell execution, timing functions were misidentified as weak cryptography, and documentation comments were misidentified as system reconnaissance. No actual risk factors present.

3
Files scanned
465
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 01:37 PM

Pure utility skill containing only documentation and TypeScript polling utilities. No risk factors detected - no scripts, network calls, filesystem access, environment variable reads, or external command execution.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 01:37 PM

Pure utility skill containing only documentation and TypeScript polling utilities. No risk factors detected - no scripts, network calls, filesystem access, environment variable reads, or external command execution.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 01:37 PM

Pure utility skill containing only documentation and TypeScript polling utilities. No risk factors detected - no scripts, network calls, filesystem access, environment variable reads, or external command execution.

2
Files scanned
280
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude