Skills dbs-standard-answer

📦

dbs-standard-answer

Name: dbs-standard-answer
Author: dontbesilent2025

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Research Conditional Answers Through Theory and History

Complex questions often receive unsupported theories or misleading historical comparisons. This skill combines theory checks, structural case comparisons, and counterexamples to develop answers with clear conditions.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 Bronze

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "dbs-standard-answer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/lockfile

Test it

Using "dbs-standard-answer". Must a successful founder stop delivering client work to build an organization? Use only the information in this question.

Expected outcome:

Direct answer: No universal rule follows from this question. Delivery and capability building compete for time, but delegation depends on task repeatability and resources.
Theory research: Treat resource allocation and organizational learning as candidate lenses. No specific theory source has been verified.
Historical comparison: No cases were supplied or verified. Search for both successful delegation and failures under similar constraints before drawing historical conclusions.
Conclusion: This is a provisional hypothesis, not a historically established answer. Track delivery quality and founder workload during a limited delegation test.

Using "dbs-standard-answer". Create a short-video direction about using theory to solve audience problems. Include historical comparison, but do not invent evidence.

Expected outcome:

Direct answer: Start with a specific audience problem, explain one mechanism, and offer an action whose result can be observed.
Theory research: Check whether a learning theory actually explains the proposed change. Label any source that has not been verified.
Historical comparison: Compare documented teaching successes with unsuccessful transfers. Evidence is still needed before claiming a repeated historical mechanism.
Video outline: Open with a common mistake, demonstrate one correction, and ask viewers to compare results. Present the approach as a test, not a guarantee.

Security Audit

Safe

v1 • 10/17/2026 Open versioned report

All 46 static findings are false positives: 44 identify Markdown backticks, and two entropy warnings concern readable Chinese text. No evidence found of malicious shell execution, obfuscated payloads, credential theft, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in either reviewed file. The skill provides research instructions and allows limited external research while explicitly respecting requests not to browse.

Files scanned

472

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

dontbesilent2025. (2026). dbs-standard-answer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1

BibTeX citation

@techreport{dontbesilent2025-dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer-2026,
  author = {dontbesilent2025},
  title = {dbs-standard-answer security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "dbs-standard-answer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "dontbesilent2025"
date-released: "2026-10-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium

Architecture

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Evaluate a strategic constraint

Compare a team's delivery bottleneck with relevant theories and historical transitions, then identify conditions for a workable response.

Develop evidence-based teaching material

Connect a theory to concrete audience problems, examine historical examples, and produce short-video outlines with observable actions.

Test a proposed explanation

Assess a causal claim using source checks, structural case comparisons, failures, and counterexamples before presenting a qualified conclusion.

Try These Prompts

Explore a practical question

Use dbs-standard-answer to explain why teams struggle to balance delivery and learning. Give a direct answer, relevant theory, historical comparisons, and clear limits.

Review a claim

Review this claim: [claim]. Identify overgeneralizations, select relevant theories, compare historical successes and failures, and label unverified evidence. State when the claim holds.

Turn research into a teaching outline

Study [theory] for [audience]. Check its meaning and sources, map practical problems, and compare historical cases. Produce three short-video outlines with actions and verification.

Conduct a bounded comparative study

Analyze [decision] under [constraints] using only [materials], without browsing. Build a structural fingerprint, theory map, and analogy matrix. Assess failures, counterexamples, evidence gaps, and conditions.

Best Practices

State the problem, constraints, desired result, and permitted research scope before requesting analysis.
Request source status, competing explanations, failure cases, and counterexamples alongside supporting evidence.
Use conclusions only within their stated conditions and validate proposed actions against observable results.

Avoid

Treating one famous story or quotation as proof of a universal solution.
Matching cases by industry or personal identity while ignoring constraints and causal mechanisms.
Presenting unverified quotations, inferred motives, or historical analogies as established facts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does standard answer mean here?

It means a mechanism supported by credible theory or independent cases, with explicit conditions and limits. The result may remain unresolved.

Do I need to provide a theory first?

No. The workflow starts from your question and proposes relevant mechanisms and theories while clearly labeling assumptions.

Does the skill always browse the web?

No. It permits browsing only when external facts materially affect the answer or verification is requested. It explicitly respects requests not to browse.

How does it handle missing evidence?

It marks unverified claims, explains missing case categories, and reduces conclusion strength. Repeated verification failures should end the search for that fact.

Can it help create videos or courses?

Yes. It can add requested teaching formats after research. Video outlines connect audience problems, mechanisms, practical actions, demonstrations, and observable results.

Does it execute scripts or install dependencies?

The reviewed package contains only research instructions and interface metadata. Its backticks format Markdown; it supplies no executable scripts or installation steps.

Developer Details

Author

dontbesilent2025

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/dontbesilent2025/dbskill/tree/926bcb9ae40f348f080f387b259fee4ec0b75f55/skills/dbs-standard-answer

Ref

e723928cd71a453ff741b6b350b3ba5989b801f2

Maintenance freshness

10/17/2026

Usage

0 downloads · 0 views

File structure

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 SKILL.md