Skills data-quality-assessment-expert
📦

data-quality-assessment-expert

Content revision r1 Safe 📁 Filesystem access⚙️ External commands🌐 Network access

Assess Data Quality with Six-Dimension Scoring

Unclear data quality weakens asset, transaction, and governance decisions. This skill scores six dimensions, assigns grades, and recommends focused remediation.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "data-quality-assessment-expert" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Test it

Using "data-quality-assessment-expert". Assess a customer dataset with 96% accuracy, 82% completeness, and delayed monthly updates.

Expected outcome:

The assessment highlights strong accuracy, weak completeness, and material timeliness risk. It recommends filling critical fields and enforcing update deadlines before final grading.

Using "data-quality-assessment-expert". Explain whether a C-grade dataset should proceed to accounting recognition.

Expected outcome:

A C grade indicates material quality gaps. Complete targeted remediation and reassessment before recognition, while documenting evidence, ownership, and remaining limitations.

Using "data-quality-assessment-expert". Create a report outline for transaction due diligence.

Expected outcome:

  • Purpose, scope, and evaluation date
  • Standards, methods, sampling, and rules
  • Six-dimension results and issue evidence
  • Weighted score, grade, and reference delta range
  • Remediation plan, limitations, and appendices

Security Audit

Safe
v1 • 9/27/2026 Open versioned report

All twelve static findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, installation documentation, ordinary website links, and the entropy of Chinese-language text. No executable scripts, network requests, obfuscated payloads, prompt injection, or unsafe data-handling intent were found.

4
Files scanned
391
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

📁 Filesystem access (2)
⚙️ External commands (3)
🌐 Network access (2)
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

图灵数盟. (2026). data-quality-assessment-expert security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/audits/1

BibTeX citation

@techreport{dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert-2026, author = {图灵数盟}, title = {data-quality-assessment-expert security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "data-quality-assessment-expert security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "图灵数盟" date-released: "2026-09-27" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:dhturing-data-quality-assessment-expert:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
65
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Prepare data for accounting recognition

Build a six-dimension assessment, document evidence, and identify quality gaps before data resource recognition.

Support buyer due diligence

Evaluate transaction data, explain its grade, and present reproducible checks for buyer review.

Prioritize quality remediation

Rank defects by severity and define focused actions for the weakest quality dimensions.

Try These Prompts

Create a basic quality checklist
Create a six-dimension data quality checklist for [dataset]. State one measurable indicator and one evidence source for each dimension.
Design a weighted scorecard
Design a GB/T 36344-2018 scorecard for [purpose]. Explain each weight, scoring rule, threshold, and required evidence.
Analyze assessment results
Assess these quality results: [results]. Calculate dimension scores, the weighted total, the grade, major defects, and recommended remediation priorities.
Develop an assessment and valuation package
Develop a complete assessment for [dataset and purpose]. Include scope, sampling, rules, scores, grade, delta range, caveats, remediation, and monitoring.

Best Practices

  • Define the business purpose, dataset scope, evaluation date, and evidence requirements before scoring.
  • Use read-only access and avoid copying or retaining source data during assessment.
  • Document formulas, samples, thresholds, and exceptions so reviewers can reproduce every score.

Avoid

  • Do not raise scores to satisfy a preferred accounting, transaction, or valuation outcome.
  • Do not infer a final grade from undocumented samples or incomplete dimension results.
  • Do not present reference delta ranges as certified appraisal or regulatory conclusions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which quality dimensions does this skill assess?
It assesses accuracy, consistency, completeness, conformity, timeliness, and accessibility.
Can it score data for different business purposes?
Yes. It can adjust weights for general use, transactions, or accounting recognition when the user explains the purpose.
Does it need the complete dataset?
No. It can work from representative samples or profiling results, but the assessment must disclose sampling limits.
What does the A-D grade mean?
A indicates strong quality, while D indicates serious deficiencies. B and C represent increasing levels of remediation need.
Can it provide a valuation coefficient?
It can suggest a reference delta range based on quality. A qualified professional must validate any formal appraisal conclusion.
Can it replace a third-party quality review?
No. It supports assessment design and documentation, but independent review may be required for regulated or high-stakes decisions.

Developer Details

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Ref

50b73f83991cf073cbdf3f5afad2bbac71dd3bae

Maintenance freshness

9/30/2026

Usage

0 downloads · 0 views

File structure