# Evaluate Code Review Feedback with Technical Rigor

The wrong review change can introduce regressions or unnecessary complexity. This skill helps users verify feedback, clarify requirements, respond with evidence, and implement accepted changes incrementally.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add davila7/receiving-code-review
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: davila7-receiving-code-review
- Skillstore revision: r2
- Version status: missing
- Tree hash: c91107e9f59f127c6312ceeb2f883c50b7cfcded7beee187d1db310a94b04919
- Author: davila7
- GitHub username: davila7
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/tree/main/cli-tool/components/skills/development/receiving-code-review
- Ref: c43861a65bb95efcae259cd161c9d6f4dc7eec6f
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: allowed
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: external\_commands
- Quality score: 78
- Quality tier: bronze
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/davila7-receiving-code-review
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/davila7-receiving-code-review/manifest

## Capabilities

- Structures feedback handling into reading, understanding, verification, evaluation, response, and implementation.
- Identifies when clarification should precede implementation.
- Guides evaluation against current behavior, compatibility, tests, usage, and architecture.
- Prioritizes blocking, simple, and complex review items.
- Provides response patterns for agreement, pushback, corrections, and GitHub review threads.

## Use Cases

- Validate pull request feedback: Check whether requested changes fit existing behavior before editing the code.
- Coordinate team reviews: Clarify related comments, prioritize accepted fixes, and track verification for each change.
- Respond to external contributors: Assess suggestions against project constraints and provide concise, evidence-based replies.

## Prompt Templates

### Review one comment

```
Evaluate this review comment: [comment]. Restate the requested change, identify missing context, and list what to verify before implementation.
```

### Clarify multiple comments

```
Review these comments: [comments]. Group related items, identify every ambiguity, and draft focused clarification questions before any implementation.
```

### Assess a questionable suggestion

```
Evaluate [suggestion] against [codebase context]. Check behavior, compatibility, usage, tests, and architecture. Recommend acceptance, revision, or evidence-based pushback.
```

### Execute a verified review plan

```
Review [comments] against [repository context]. Separate accepted, rejected, and unclear items. Prioritize accepted fixes, implement each separately, and report verification results.
```

## Limitations

- Does not inspect code or run tests without access to project tools.
- Cannot resolve ambiguous requirements without user or reviewer input.
- Provides workflow guidance, not language-specific implementation rules.
- Does not replace security review, maintainer decisions, or project documentation.

## Best Practices

- Read all feedback and clarify related ambiguities before changing code.
- Verify each suggestion against usage, compatibility, architecture, and tests.
- Implement accepted items individually and test after every change.

## Anti Patterns

- Agreeing or implementing before confirming technical correctness.
- Applying understood items while related feedback remains unclear.
- Rejecting feedback defensively without evidence from code, tests, or requirements.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-07-23T14:07:16.151\+00:00
- Summary: All 24 external-command findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, not executable Ruby or shell syntax. The network-reconnaissance finding is also a false positive; line 124 only recommends technical reasoning. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, command execution, or network reconnaissance intent was found.

## Stats

- Views: 264
- Downloads: 7
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0