Skills file-organizer Audit History
📦

Audit History

file-organizer - 10 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v10 LatestJul 23, 2026, 01:51 PM 2 confirmed0No capability change
v9 Jul 8, 2026, 05:42 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v8 Jul 5, 2026, 08:54 AM No confirmed findings0 Filesystem access
v7 Jun 29, 2026, 01:24 PM No confirmed findings3Filesystem access
v6 Jan 21, 2026, 06:30 PM No confirmed findings1No capability change
v5 Jan 17, 2026, 01:26 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 01:26 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v3 Jan 7, 2026, 12:56 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jan 7, 2026, 12:56 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 7, 2026, 12:56 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 23, 2026, 01:51 PM

All 12 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown fences or benign prose; no Ruby backtick execution or reconnaissance appears. The skill nevertheless presents shell commands that accept unquoted directory placeholders and a plain `mv` example that may overwrite files. These operational risks require safer command construction and collision handling before unattended use.

1
Files scanned
251
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Medium
Shell Injection Through Unquoted Path Placeholders
Commands interpolate the user-selected `[target_directory]` or `[directory]` placeholder without shell quoting. A path containing shell metacharacters could execute unintended commands if substituted directly.
The examples visibly place path placeholders into shell command positions without quoting. Runtime substitution is agent-dependent, so exploitation is plausible but not guaranteed.
Medium
Potential Overwrite During File Moves
The example uses plain `mv`, which can replace an existing destination without warning. This conflicts with the later instruction to handle filename conflicts gracefully.
The documented command uses `mv` without a no-clobber or interactive option. An existing writable destination can therefore be overwritten before the prose safeguard is applied.
Audited by: codex

Jul 8, 2026, 05:42 AM

All static detections were adjudicated as false positives. The external-command matches are Markdown code fences with illustrative shell examples, and the blocker matches are ordinary file naming guidance. No prompt injection, credential access, network calls, or hidden execution logic was found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
251
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 29, 2026, 01:24 PM

Static analysis flagged many Markdown code fences as Ruby backtick execution, but no Ruby execution was found in SKILL.md. The skill does instruct agents to run shell commands and move files, so it is a legitimate productivity skill with medium operational risk. Weak crypto and reconnaissance alerts at the reported lines are false positives; the only MD5 usage is for duplicate detection, not security.

1
Files scanned
434
Lines analyzed
5
Review items
1
False positives ignored
Capability review items (3)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Medium
Shell Commands Operate on User-Selected Paths
The skill provides shell command examples using placeholders such as target directories. This is legitimate for file organization, but direct substitution of unsafe paths could cause command errors or shell injection.
The commands are documented examples, not hidden executable code. Risk remains because they are intended to be adapted to user-provided filesystem paths.
Medium
File Moves and Deletion Workflow Can Be Destructive
The skill instructs agents to move, rename, archive, and potentially delete files after approval. This can affect user data if the plan is wrong or confirmation is misunderstood.
The file modification workflow is explicit and central to the skill. The skill also includes approval safeguards, so the risk is operational rather than malicious.
Low
MD5 Used Only for Duplicate Detection
The static weak-cryptography alerts are false positives for the reported lines. The only clear MD5 command is used to group likely duplicate files, not to protect secrets or verify trust.
The surrounding instructions describe exact duplicate detection. No evidence found that MD5 is used for authentication, signing, encryption, or security decisions.
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Reconnaissance Alerts Are False Positives
The reported reconnaissance lines contain examples about Downloads, naming, and Desktop cleanup. No evidence found of network scanning, host discovery, credential collection, or system profiling.
The cited lines are plain file-organization guidance. They do not contain network commands, host enumeration commands, or credential handling.

Detected Patterns

External Shell Commands
Audited by: codex

Jan 21, 2026, 06:30 PM

This skill is a documentation-only resource providing instructions for file organization tasks. Static analysis flagged 71 patterns (md5 usage, shell commands), but all are false positives - they are instructional examples in markdown code blocks, not executable code. The skill teaches users to run standard file system commands like find, mv, and mkdir. No malicious intent detected.

2
Files scanned
1,182
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Capability review items (1)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Low
Documentation contains shell command examples
The SKILL.md file contains numerous examples of bash commands (find, mv, mkdir, ls, du) for file organization. These are instructional examples in markdown code blocks, not executable code. Users must manually run these commands. This is standard practice for CLI tool documentation and presents minimal risk.
Audited by: claude

Jan 7, 2026, 12:56 AM

This is a prompt-based skill containing only natural language instructions for the AI. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or direct filesystem access patterns are present. The skill relies on the AI's built-in tools and requires explicit user consent before any file operations.

1
Files scanned
434
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 7, 2026, 12:56 AM

This is a prompt-based skill containing only natural language instructions for the AI. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or direct filesystem access patterns are present. The skill relies on the AI's built-in tools and requires explicit user consent before any file operations.

1
Files scanned
434
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 7, 2026, 12:56 AM

This is a prompt-based skill containing only natural language instructions for the AI. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or direct filesystem access patterns are present. The skill relies on the AI's built-in tools and requires explicit user consent before any file operations.

1
Files scanned
434
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude