Audit History
analyzing-projects - 9 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v9 Latest | Jul 18, 2026, 10:50 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v8 | Jul 5, 2026, 06:51 AM | 1 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v7 | Jul 5, 2026, 06:51 AM | 1 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v6 | Jun 28, 2026, 11:09 PM | No confirmed findings | 3 | No capability change |
| v5 | Jan 16, 2026, 09:38 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jan 16, 2026, 09:38 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commandsFilesystem access |
| v3 | Jan 10, 2026, 12:27 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jan 10, 2026, 12:27 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Jan 10, 2026, 12:27 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 18, 2026, 10:50 AM
This skill is a purely instructional Markdown workflow that guides an agent through analyzing a codebase (README review, tech stack detection, structure mapping, workflow discovery). All 34 static findings are false positives: 33 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' hits matched Markdown code fences and inline code spans in documentation, not executable code, and the single filesystem finding is a harmless read-only 'cat README.md | head -50' overview command. No network access, no credential handling, no data exfiltration, and no prompt-injection content were found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (33)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jul 5, 2026, 06:51 AM
Most static findings are Markdown code fences or inline code formatting, not executable Ruby backtick usage. However, the workflow asks for development commands to be verified, which can lead an assistant to run untrusted install, dev, test, or build scripts. The skill should require explicit approval and sandboxing before any project-defined command is executed.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (33)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jul 5, 2026, 06:51 AM
Most static findings are Markdown code fences or inline code formatting, not executable Ruby backtick usage. However, the workflow asks for development commands to be verified, which can lead an assistant to run untrusted install, dev, test, or build scripts. The skill should require explicit approval and sandboxing before any project-defined command is executed.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (33)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jun 28, 2026, 11:09 PM
The static command findings are mostly false positives caused by Markdown code fences and inline backticks, not Ruby backtick execution. The skill does instruct assistants to inspect files and may lead users to run package-manager commands in unfamiliar repositories, which creates a real but contextual execution risk. No evidence found of malicious intent, network exfiltration, credential harvesting, obfuscation, or prompt injection.
Capability review items (3)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (3)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Detected Patterns
Jan 16, 2026, 09:38 PM
This is a documentation-only skill containing no executable code. All 54 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES caused by the scanner misinterpreting markdown syntax and template placeholders. The SKILL.md file contains only documentation, checklists, and example formatting - no actual shell commands, cryptographic algorithms, or network operations are present. The skill provides a structured workflow for codebase analysis.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (40)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jan 16, 2026, 09:38 PM
This is a documentation-only skill containing no executable code. All 54 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES caused by the scanner misinterpreting markdown syntax and template placeholders. The SKILL.md file contains only documentation, checklists, and example formatting - no actual shell commands, cryptographic algorithms, or network operations are present. The skill provides a structured workflow for codebase analysis.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (40)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jan 10, 2026, 12:27 PM
This is a documentation-only skill with no executable code. It provides structured instructions for analyzing codebases using standard Unix commands. No security risks identified.
Jan 10, 2026, 12:27 PM
This is a documentation-only skill with no executable code. It provides structured instructions for analyzing codebases using standard Unix commands. No security risks identified.
Jan 10, 2026, 12:27 PM
This is a documentation-only skill with no executable code. It provides structured instructions for analyzing codebases using standard Unix commands. No security risks identified.