# Plan and Improve Social Media Articles

Social media articles often lack audience focus, clear structure, or measurable quality checks. This skill guides planning, drafting, review, and performance diagnosis.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add ceeon/writing-assistant
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: ceeon-writing-assistant
- Skillstore revision: r3
- Version status: missing
- Tree hash: ff917bcbc80884e17930fee513c708c8bf5da2c7ab80bc9ee43fdab3deb521ea
- Author: Ceeon
- GitHub username: Ceeon
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/Ceeon/writing-assistant-skill/tree/main/
- Ref: c43861a65bb95efcae259cd161c9d6f4dc7eec6f
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: allowed
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: filesystem, external\_commands
- Quality score: 78
- Quality tier: bronze
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/ceeon-writing-assistant
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/ceeon-writing-assistant/manifest

## Capabilities

- Routes requests for new articles, draft reviews, headline work, formatting, and performance diagnosis.
- Uses author positioning and audience personas to guide content decisions.
- Checks topics, outlines, body text, headlines, and formatting against explicit criteria.
- Scores draft readiness with publish, improve, or redo thresholds.
- Identifies likely weaknesses in underperforming articles through the same review checklist.

## Use Cases

- Plan a New Article: Turn a topic into an audience-aware outline with a clear promise and review criteria.
- Review an Existing Draft: Score a draft and prioritize revisions across topic, structure, body, headline, and formatting.
- Diagnose Weak Performance: Compare an underperforming article with the checklist and identify probable content weaknesses.

## Prompt Templates

### Check My Draft

```
Review this draft with the checklist. Give a score, explain failed criteria, and list the three highest-priority revisions: [draft]
```

### Plan an Article

```
Plan an article about [topic] for [audiences]. Define the reader situation, information gain, promise, outline, and review checklist.
```

### Improve Headlines

```
Evaluate these headlines for clarity, numerical contrast, drama, and accessibility. Rank them and propose five stronger alternatives: [headlines]
```

### Diagnose Performance

```
Analyze this article and its supplied metrics. Separate content weaknesses from unsupported assumptions, then recommend prioritized experiments: [article and metrics]
```

## Limitations

- The package references detailed method files that are not included in the scanned file structure.
- Author positioning, prohibited topics, terminology, and audience profiles require manual customization.
- The skill cannot verify search-result counts or performance metrics without supplied evidence.
- It does not publish content, validate factual claims, or guarantee audience performance.

## Best Practices

- Customize author positioning and audience profiles before requesting article work.
- Provide the complete draft, intended audience, channel, and available performance evidence.
- Treat checklist scores as revision guidance and verify facts independently.

## Anti Patterns

- Do not request performance diagnosis without sharing the article or relevant metrics.
- Do not use placeholder audience profiles as final publishing guidance.
- Do not accept dramatic numerical claims without checking their source and context.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-07-23T11:54:28.241\+00:00
- Summary: All 22 static findings are false positives. Markdown backticks identify filenames or formatting examples, the README shows a standard local installation command, and the Chinese Markdown content explains the entropy score.

## Stats

- Views: 396
- Downloads: 82
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0