Skills analyzing-response-quality

📦

analyzing-response-quality

Name: analyzing-response-quality
Author: C0ntr0lledCha0s

v1.0.0 Content revision r2 Safe ⚙️ External commands⚡ Contains scripts🔑 Env variables

Evaluate AI Response Quality Systematically

AI responses can miss requirements, hide errors, or communicate unclear conclusions. This skill applies a structured rubric to identify gaps and prioritize improvements.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "analyzing-response-quality" from https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/lockfile

Test it

Using "analyzing-response-quality". Review an authentication implementation against the request and identify the most important gaps.

Expected outcome:

Overall quality: 3 out of 5.
Critical issue: The login query is vulnerable to injection.
Coverage gap: Password reset and rate limiting are missing.
Priority action: Parameterize queries, strengthen password hashing, and add abuse controls.

Using "analyzing-response-quality". Evaluate an explanation of asynchronous JavaScript for a beginner.

Expected outcome:

Clarity is strong, with a logical progression and practical examples.
Completeness is limited because error handling and parallel operations are absent.
Add a try-catch example, explain Promise.all, and include one short exercise.

Using "analyzing-response-quality". Check whether a product support answer fully addresses the customer request.

Expected outcome:

The response answers the setup question but misses rollback guidance and expected results. Add both items and clarify the required permissions.

Security Audit

Safe

v10 • 7/23/2026 Open versioned report

All 51 static alerts are false positives. They match Markdown fences, scanner rule definitions, explanatory strings, or benign AST inspection rather than dangerous execution. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, or malicious intent.

Files scanned

1,186

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (30)

⚡ Contains scripts (6)

scripts/check-security.py:27 scripts/check-security.py:82 scripts/check-security.py:34 scripts/check-security.py:28 scripts/check-security.py:91 scripts/check-security.py:93

🔑 Env variables (2)

scripts/check-security.py:118 scripts/check-security.py:110

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex View Audit History →

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/audits/10?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

C0ntr0lledCha0s. (2026). analyzing-response-quality security audit report (audit version 10) [Author version 1.0.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/audits/10

BibTeX citation

@techreport{c0ntr0lledcha0s-c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality-2026,
  author = {C0ntr0lledCha0s},
  title = {analyzing-response-quality security audit report (audit version 10)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {10},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/audits/10},
  note = {Author version 1.0.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "analyzing-response-quality security audit report (audit version 10)"
version: "1.0.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "C0ntr0lledCha0s"
date-released: "2026-07-23"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality/audits/10"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:c0ntr0lledcha0s-analyzing-response-quality:audit:10"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High

Architecture

100

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Review Technical Answers

Evaluate generated code and explanations for correctness, security, edge cases, and maintainability before delivery.

Improve Support Responses

Check whether customer answers address every question with clear language, useful steps, and appropriate detail.

Calibrate AI Evaluations

Apply a consistent scoring framework across sample responses and identify recurring weaknesses.

Try These Prompts

Basic Response Review

Review this response for correctness, completeness, and clarity. List three strengths and three improvements: [response]

Requirement Coverage Check

Compare this response with the original request. Map every requirement to evidence, identify gaps, and recommend fixes: [request] [response]

Full Quality Score

Evaluate this technical response across correctness, completeness, clarity, efficiency, security, and usability. Score each dimension from 1 to 5: [response]

Recurring Pattern Audit

Audit these responses for recurring quality patterns. Prioritize systemic issues, explain user impact, and propose measurable improvements: [responses] [evaluation criteria]