Skills quality
📦

quality

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Validate Python Code Quality

Python projects need consistent formatting, linting, and pre-commit checks before review. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through Black, Ruff, BasedPyright, and pre-commit workflows.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "quality" from https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/lockfile

Test it

Using "quality". Format the project and report the result.

Expected outcome:

  • Applied the formatting workflow with Black and Ruff.
  • Formatting completed without remaining style issues.
  • Review changed files before committing.

Using "quality". Run quality checks before merge.

Expected outcome:

  • Linting found import order and error message issues.
  • Type checking completed for source files.
  • Pre-commit hooks should be rerun after fixes.

Using "quality". Review our Python quality standards.

Expected outcome:

  • The workflow uses an 88 character line length.
  • Ruff rules cover blind exceptions, error messages, private access, package files, debugger use, and logging formats.
  • Tests and scripts have more relaxed rules.

Security Audit

Safe
v8 • 7/6/2026 Open versioned report

The two static findings are false positives from Markdown backtick fences around documented shell commands in SKILL.md. The skill is prompt-only and lists fixed quality-tool commands; no prompt injection, exfiltration intent, or dynamic execution logic was found.

1
Files scanned
61
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (2)
SKILL.md:28-42 SKILL.md:42-55
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

ByronWilliamsCPA. (2026). quality security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/audits/8

BibTeX citation

@techreport{byronwilliamscpa-byronwilliamscpa-quality-2026, author = {ByronWilliamsCPA}, title = {quality security audit report (audit version 8)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {8}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/audits/8}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "quality security audit report (audit version 8)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "ByronWilliamsCPA" date-released: "2026-07-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/byronwilliamscpa-quality/audits/8" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:byronwilliamscpa-quality:audit:8" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
85
Content
70
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Prepare a Python Pull Request

Format code, run lint checks, and verify pre-commit hooks before requesting review.

Check Repository Standards

Confirm that project code follows documented Python quality rules and naming expectations.

Run Pre-Commit Before Release

Validate all configured hooks before a release branch or deployment review.

Try These Prompts

Format the Project 
Use the quality skill to format this Python project. Report which formatter steps ran and whether files changed.
Lint and Fix Issues 
Use the quality skill to run lint checks and apply safe automatic fixes. Summarize remaining issues for manual review.
Validate Types and Hooks 
Use the quality skill to run type checking and all pre-commit hooks. Explain any failures with file-level guidance.
Audit the Quality Workflow 
Use the quality skill to review the repository quality workflow. Compare formatting, linting, type checking, and pre-commit coverage.

Best Practices

  • Run formatting before linting so style changes are stable.
  • Review automatic fixes before committing them.
  • Use the same tool versions in local and continuous integration checks.

Avoid

  • Running fixes without reviewing changed files.
  • Ignoring type checker failures because tests pass.
  • Changing lint rules only to silence current errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

What languages does this skill focus on?
It focuses on Python projects that use Black, Ruff, BasedPyright, and pre-commit.
Can it install missing tools?
No. The required tools must already be available in the project environment.
Does it change source files automatically?
It can guide an AI tool to run formatting or safe lint fixes when the user asks.
Can it replace code review?
No. It supports review by catching quality issues, but humans should still inspect changes.
Does it include type checking?
Yes. The documented workflow includes BasedPyright checks for source files.
Can it run all pre-commit hooks?
Yes. The workflow includes a full pre-commit validation step when hooks are configured.

Developer Details

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/ByronWilliamsCPA/fragrance-rater/tree/main/.claude/skills/quality

Ref

dd4a3ef9f20ddf38830950b4bb713df96b431fd6

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

8 downloads · 196 views

File structure

📄 SKILL.md