Skills thinking-deeply
📦

thinking-deeply

Content revision r1 Safe

Think Deeply Before Answering

Quick agreement can hide weak assumptions and missing context. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through structured analysis before recommending a path.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 78 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "thinking-deeply" from https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/lockfile

Test it

Using "thinking-deeply". Is React better than Vue for my project?

Expected outcome:

  • The better question is which framework fits your team, product scope, and delivery timeline.
  • React may fit complex applications with experienced teams and hiring needs.
  • Vue may fit faster onboarding, smaller teams, and more opinionated structure.
  • The recommendation depends on team experience, project size, timeline, and maintenance plans.

Using "thinking-deeply". Should we use microservices because they are modern?

Expected outcome:

  • Modern is not the main decision factor. The key question is whether your system needs independent services.
  • Microservices help with team autonomy and independent scaling, but add operational complexity.
  • A modular monolith can be stronger for small teams, early products, and simpler deployment.
  • Choose microservices only when the organizational and scaling benefits justify the added cost.

Security Audit

Safe
v7 • 7/6/2026 Open versioned report

All nine static findings are false positives caused by documentation phrases about perspectives, trade-offs, and framework examples. I found no executable code, system reconnaissance behavior, prompt injection attempt, network call, or file access intent in the reviewed files.

3
Files scanned
629
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/audits/7?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

brunoasm. (2026). thinking-deeply security audit report (audit version 7) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/audits/7

BibTeX citation

@techreport{brunoasm-brunoasm-thinking-deeply-2026, author = {brunoasm}, title = {thinking-deeply security audit report (audit version 7)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {7}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/audits/7}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "thinking-deeply security audit report (audit version 7)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "brunoasm" date-released: "2026-07-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/brunoasm-thinking-deeply/audits/7" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:brunoasm-thinking-deeply:audit:7" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
85
Content
70
Community
91
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Evaluate Technical Choices

Compare frameworks, tools, or architectures with clear trade-offs and context factors.

Improve Product Decisions

Review feature, roadmap, or strategy questions before committing to one direction.

Challenge Assumptions

Surface hidden premises and alternative interpretations in research or planning discussions.

Try These Prompts

Compare Two Options 
Should I choose option A or option B? Reframe the decision and compare the trade-offs.
Test My Assumption 
I think this approach is clearly best. Examine the assumption and show when it may fail.
Choose a Technical Direction 
Help me choose a technical direction by comparing team fit, complexity, maintenance, and delivery risk.
Build a Decision Framework 
Create a decision framework for this strategic choice, including alternatives, context dependencies, and a qualified recommendation.

Best Practices

  • Use the skill for decisions with real trade-offs or hidden assumptions.
  • Provide project goals, constraints, and audience details for better recommendations.
  • Ask for a final recommendation after the skill explores alternatives.

Avoid

  • Do not use it to avoid direct answers when facts are already clear.
  • Do not treat every option as equal when evidence strongly favors one path.
  • Do not omit the user's real constraints from the analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?
It guides the assistant to pause, reframe the question, compare perspectives, and give a context-aware recommendation.
When should I use it?
Use it for confirmation questions, binary choices, leading statements, and decisions with important trade-offs.
Does it use external services?
No. It is a prompt-only skill and does not call APIs, run commands, or access files.
Can it provide a direct answer?
Yes. It still gives a recommendation after it explains the main perspectives and context dependencies.
Will it work with Codex and Claude Code?
Yes. The report lists support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code.
Is it useful outside software topics?
Yes. It can support product, research, writing, and planning decisions that need careful reasoning.

Developer Details

Author

brunoasm

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/brunoasm/my_claude_skills/tree/main/think_deeply

Ref

dd4a3ef9f20ddf38830950b4bb713df96b431fd6

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

11 downloads · 185 views

File structure

📄 evaluation.json

📄 README.md

📄 SKILL.md