Skills reasoning-analogical
📦
reasoning-analogical
Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands
Apply Analogical Reasoning to New Problems
Teams often face new markets or products without a direct playbook. This skill maps proven source cases to a new target and adapts the plan.
Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "reasoning-analogical" from https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "reasoning-analogical". A team wants to adapt a successful DTC launch playbook to a B2B marketplace launch.
Expected outcome:
- Selected source: DTC platform launch with strong integration similarity.
- Preserved: marketplace discovery, integration-first positioning, and fast value demonstration.
- Modified: self-serve onboarding becomes assisted onboarding because B2B buying is slower.
- Plan: partnership setup, pilot customers, case studies, then referral-led expansion.
Using "reasoning-analogical". A product manager wants to transfer a fashion sizing workflow to home goods recommendations.
Expected outcome:
- Mapped objects: fashion brand becomes home goods brand, fit concern becomes space compatibility.
- Broken relation: body measurements do not transfer directly to room dimensions.
- New capability: room measurement capture and dimension-based recommendation logic.
- Confidence: moderate, with technical uncertainty around visualization complexity.
Using "reasoning-analogical". An operations team has three prior rollout examples and needs the best analogy.
Expected outcome:
- Best source: the rollout with the closest workflow dependencies and documented metrics.
- Rejected source: high revenue outcome but weak structural similarity.
- Next step: validate the two largest context differences before copying the playbook.
Security Audit
Safev8 • 7/6/2026 Open versioned report
Static analysis flagged Markdown backtick fences and one scoring-table phrase, not executable commands. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or business-logic abuse was found in SKILL.md. The skill is an instructional analogical reasoning framework with YAML and text examples.
1
Files scanned
375
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (25)
SKILL.md:12-20 SKILL.md:20-53 SKILL.md:53-76 SKILL.md:76-79 SKILL.md:79-92 SKILL.md:92-109 SKILL.md:109-146 SKILL.md:146-153 SKILL.md:153-160 SKILL.md:160-163 SKILL.md:163-203 SKILL.md:203-210 SKILL.md:210-234 SKILL.md:234-237 SKILL.md:237-271 SKILL.md:271-294 SKILL.md:294-330 SKILL.md:330-337 SKILL.md:337-342 SKILL.md:342-345 SKILL.md:345-355 SKILL.md:355-358 SKILL.md:358-362 SKILL.md:362-365 SKILL.md:365-374
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
BellaBe. (2026). reasoning-analogical security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical/audits/8BibTeX citation
@techreport{bellabe-bellabe-reasoning-analogical-2026,
author = {BellaBe},
title = {reasoning-analogical security audit report (audit version 8)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {8},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical/audits/8},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "reasoning-analogical security audit report (audit version 8)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "BellaBe"
date-released: "2026-07-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/bellabe-reasoning-analogical/audits/8"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:bellabe-reasoning-analogical:audit:8"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: High 55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
70
Community
91
Spec Compliance
What You Can Build
Plan a Market Expansion
Map a successful launch in one vertical to a new vertical, then adapt sales, onboarding, and success metrics.
Adapt a Product Playbook
Transfer lessons from an existing product workflow to a new product line while marking what must change.
Compare Strategic Options
Evaluate multiple past cases and choose the source analogy with the strongest structural fit.
Try These Prompts
Map One Known Case
Use analogical reasoning. Source case: [known case]. Target situation: [new situation]. Map the key objects, relations, constraints, and likely adaptations.
Choose the Best Source
Compare these source cases for my target: [cases]. Score structural similarity, outcome quality, recency, success, and context overlap. Select the best source.
Build an Adapted Plan
Map [source case] to [target context]. List preserved, modified, and broken relationships. Produce a phased plan with milestones, timeline, confidence, and uncertainties.
Stress Test the Analogy
Review this analogy: [mapping]. Find surface similarities, over-transfer, under-adaptation, and missing context differences. Recommend changes before execution.
Best Practices
- Provide source cases with documented outcomes, metrics, constraints, and timeframes.
- Focus mapping on relationships and mechanisms, not surface labels.
- Use the uncertainty section to plan validation before execution.
Avoid
- Do not copy a source playbook without listing context differences.
- Do not rely on a single weak analogy when better source cases exist.
- Do not treat analogy as proof of future success.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
It transfers lessons from known source cases to new situations using explicit structural mapping and adaptation.
When should I use it?
Use it when a new problem resembles a past market, product, rollout, or operating model.
What inputs work best?
Provide the target situation, candidate source cases, outcomes, constraints, and known differences.
Can it choose between multiple analogies?
Yes. It scores candidate sources by structural similarity, documented outcome, recency, success, and context overlap.
Does it validate the plan?
It identifies uncertainty and quality risks, but users should validate assumptions with evidence.
Does it require external tools?
No. The skill is a reasoning framework and does not require command execution, network access, or scripts.