Skills full-review
📦

full-review

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands📁 Filesystem access

Run Comprehensive Code Reviews

Large changes can hide regressions across security, types, performance, and product surfaces. This skill coordinates review checklists and targeted expertise for a structured pre-commit report.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 78 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "full-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/barissozen-full-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/barissozen-full-review.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/barissozen-full-review/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/barissozen-full-review/lockfile

Test it

Using "full-review". Review my current TypeScript and database changes before commit.

Expected outcome:

The report lists changed files, applied TypeScript and database checks, one warning about schema validation, and a ready-to-commit status.

Using "full-review". Run a full review on my DeFi routing updates.

Expected outcome:

The report highlights token decimal checks, slippage protection, RPC error handling, and separates critical issues from suggested improvements.

Using "full-review". Check this frontend pull request for quality issues.

Expected outcome:

The report covers React loading states, routing usage, TanStack Query behavior, and user interface warnings in a severity-based format.

Security Audit

Safe
v9 • 7/6/2026 Open versioned report

Static findings were false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code markers, command names, and checklist text. The only actual command guidance is read-only git diff and status usage for review context; no prompt injection, secret access, network exfiltration, or destructive command intent was found.

1
Files scanned
180
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (21)
SKILL.md:50-54 SKILL.md:54-62 SKILL.md:62 SKILL.md:63-64 SKILL.md:64-65 SKILL.md:65-66 SKILL.md:66 SKILL.md:67-68 SKILL.md:68-69 SKILL.md:69 SKILL.md:70 SKILL.md:71 SKILL.md:72 SKILL.md:73 SKILL.md:95-120 SKILL.md:120-132 SKILL.md:132-138 SKILL.md:138-165 SKILL.md:165-177 SKILL.md:177-178 SKILL.md:178-179
📁 Filesystem access (1)
SKILL.md:52
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review/audits/9?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/barissozen-full-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/barissozen-full-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/barissozen-full-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

BarisSozen. (2026). full-review security audit report (audit version 9) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review/audits/9

BibTeX citation

@techreport{barissozen-barissozen-full-review-2026, author = {BarisSozen}, title = {full-review security audit report (audit version 9)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {9}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review/audits/9}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "full-review security audit report (audit version 9)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "BarisSozen" date-released: "2026-07-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/barissozen-full-review/audits/9" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:barissozen-full-review:audit:9" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
71
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Pre-Commit Review

Run a broad review before committing local changes, with critical issues separated from warnings and suggestions.

Full-Stack Pull Request Check

Evaluate backend, frontend, database, and Rust changes with checklists tailored to each surface.

DeFi Change Assessment

Review protocol, token, arbitrage, swap, and RPC changes for domain-specific correctness and risk.

Try These Prompts

Review Current Changes 
Run full-review on my current changes. List critical issues first, then warnings and suggestions.
Check a Pull Request 
Use full-review for this pull request. Include files reviewed, skills applied, and whether it is ready to merge.
Focus on Risk Areas 
Run full-review with extra attention to security, database changes, external calls, and type safety. Explain each high-impact finding.
Review and Prepare Fixes 
Run full-review, rank findings by severity, propose fixes for critical issues, and wait for approval before changing files.

Best Practices

  • Run the skill after staging or clearly defining the changes to review.
  • Share test, lint, and build commands when the repository uses custom validation.
  • Review critical findings manually before approving automated fixes.

Avoid

  • Using the skill as the only approval for security-sensitive changes.
  • Running it without enough repository context or changed files.
  • Accepting optional fixes without reviewing the proposed patch.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill review?
It reviews changed files across security, type safety, performance, DeFi, database, React, and RPC concerns.
Does it run tests automatically?
It does not define test commands. Provide project commands if you want validation after the review.
Can it fix issues?
It can propose fixes for critical issues and apply them only after approval.
Does it require other skills?
It is designed to invoke specialized review skills when available, but results depend on the installed skill set.
Is it useful for non-DeFi projects?
Yes. The general security, type safety, performance, frontend, backend, and database checks still apply.
Who should use it?
Developers and reviewers who want a structured pre-commit or pre-merge review across multiple code areas.

Developer Details

Author

BarisSozen

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/BarisSozen/claude/tree/main/.claude/skills/full-review

Ref

c4231f0153ccd2a2ed62274c5a372bf8f2386d3f

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

8 downloads · 264 views

File structure

📄 SKILL.md