Audit History

All 280 static findings are false positives caused by documentation syntax, SwiftUI terminology, parser metadata, or the intended local xctrace workflow. The trace recorder uses argument vectors instead of a shell, redacts displayed launch environment values, and requires explicit confirmation before system-wide recording. No prompt injection, credential access, network exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.

Static matches were predominantly lexical false positives from Markdown backticks, SwiftUI API names, XML identifiers, and fixed-argument xctrace subprocess calls. One semantic issue remains: the recorder prints environment arguments, which may expose secrets in logs or agent transcripts.

All 276 static findings were adjudicated as false positives. Most are documentation or identifier matches; the bundled scripts perform only the documented local Instruments workflow with argument-array subprocess calls. No prompt injection, credential access, data exfiltration, or command-injection intent was found.

All 276 static findings were adjudicated as false positives. Most are documentation or identifier matches; the bundled scripts perform only the documented local Instruments workflow with argument-array subprocess calls. No prompt injection, credential access, data exfiltration, or command-injection intent was found.

All 276 static findings were adjudicated as false positives. Most are documentation or identifier matches; the bundled scripts perform only the documented local Instruments workflow with argument-array subprocess calls. No prompt injection, credential access, data exfiltration, or command-injection intent was found.

Static analysis flagged markdown backticks, SwiftUI UI terms, and one example URL. Review found these are documentation examples and references, with no executable scripts, shell commands, network calls, data exfiltration, or prompt injection.

Static analysis flagged markdown backticks, SwiftUI UI terms, and one example URL. Review found these are documentation examples and references, with no executable scripts, shell commands, network calls, data exfiltration, or prompt injection.

Static analysis reported many command, reconnaissance, network, and weak-crypto indicators, but review found they are SwiftUI documentation false positives. The skill contains markdown guidance and Swift examples, with no executable scripts, no command execution instructions, and no evidence of data exfiltration or prompt injection.

All static findings are false positives. The 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' detections are markdown code block delimiters in documentation files. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' and 'system reconnaissance' patterns are false positives from documentation text and file paths. No actual code execution, network calls, or prompt injection attempts exist. This is a pure documentation skill containing SwiftUI best practices and reference guides.