📦

Audit History

allra-error-handling - 10 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v10 LatestJul 23, 2026, 05:19 AM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v9 Jul 7, 2026, 06:10 PM 2 confirmed0No capability change
v8 Jul 5, 2026, 03:08 AM 2 confirmed0External commands
v7 Jun 28, 2026, 09:29 AM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v6 Jan 21, 2026, 03:21 PM No confirmed findings0 External commands
v5 Jan 16, 2026, 03:19 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jan 16, 2026, 03:19 PM No confirmed findings0External commands
v3 Jan 10, 2026, 10:18 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jan 10, 2026, 10:18 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 10, 2026, 10:18 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 23, 2026, 05:19 AM

All 21 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences or ordinary Java identifiers; the skill executes no external commands. One medium-severity design concern remains because examples may expose personal or sensitive values through logs and validation responses.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Potential Sensitive Data Exposure in Logs and Errors
Examples log exception details and email addresses, then return rejected values without redaction. Reuse could expose passwords, tokens, or personal data.
The examples explicitly log email and exception content and expose rejected input values. Secret exposure depends on which request fields reach these paths.
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 06:10 PM

All static external command and blocker detections are false positives from Markdown fences and Java examples. No executable shell code or system reconnaissance instruction is present. Two semantic issues remain: logging email addresses and returning rejected input values may expose personal data.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Medium
Sensitive Data Logging Guidance
The logging examples recommend writing user email addresses during signup and failed login events. This can expose personal data in application logs.
The cited lines explicitly log email values in recommended structured logging examples. Email is personal data and failed login logs are sensitive.
Medium
Rejected Input Echoed in Error Responses
The validation handler maps rejected values into public error responses. Echoing rejected inputs can expose submitted secrets or personal data.
The code maps error.getRejectedValue() into the response model and the example returns an email-like value. This is a common data exposure pattern.
Audited by: codex

Jul 5, 2026, 03:08 AM

Most static command-execution findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences in Java and JSON examples. I found no prompt injection or malicious execution intent in SKILL.md. Two semantic privacy issues remain: validation responses echo rejected values and logging examples include raw email addresses.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Medium
Sensitive Validation Values in Error Responses
The validation handler copies rejected input values into ErrorResponse.FieldError. If a password, token, account number, or regulated value fails validation, the API response can expose it.
The code example directly maps rejectedValue into the error response. The impact depends on field sensitivity, so confidence is high but not absolute.
Medium
PII Logging in Recommended Examples
The logging section recommends structured log messages that include raw email values for signup and failed login events. Application logs can become long-lived stores of personal data.
The example explicitly includes email values in INFO and WARN log statements. The final checklist warns about sensitive data, but it does not require masking personal data.
Audited by: codex

Jun 28, 2026, 09:29 AM

The static external command findings are false positives caused by markdown code fences in SKILL.md, not executable shell or Ruby code. The weak cryptography and reconnaissance alerts are also false positives from normal prose or Java examples. A moderate issue remains because examples show rejected values and email addresses in responses or logs, which can expose personal data if copied directly.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Potential Personal Data Exposure in Error Responses and Logs
The skill examples include rejected input values in validation error responses and email addresses in structured logs. This can expose personal data or user-supplied secrets if teams copy the examples without redaction.
The examples directly include rejectedValue and email fields in output paths. The risk depends on implementation, but the guidance can be copied into production error handling and logging.

Detected Patterns

Logging or Returning User-Controlled Values
Audited by: codex

Jan 21, 2026, 03:21 PM

All static findings are false positives. The skill is a documentation-only skill containing Java code examples for error handling patterns. No actual security risks present.

2
Files scanned
758
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 16, 2026, 03:19 PM

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

2
Files scanned
544
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Detected Patterns

Weak cryptographic algorithmRuby/shell backtick executionSystem reconnaissance
Audited by: claude

Jan 16, 2026, 03:19 PM

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

2
Files scanned
544
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Detected Patterns

Weak cryptographic algorithmRuby/shell backtick executionSystem reconnaissance
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 10:18 AM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown with Java code templates for error handling. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or filesystem access. Contains no security concerns.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 10:18 AM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown with Java code templates for error handling. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or filesystem access. Contains no security concerns.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 10:18 AM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown with Java code templates for error handling. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or filesystem access. Contains no security concerns.

1
Files scanned
366
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude