Audit History

The only static finding is a false positive caused by inline Markdown command usage in SKILL.md. No evidence found for prompt injection, data exfiltration, or unauthorized network, filesystem, or environment access.

The only static finding is a false positive caused by inline Markdown command usage in SKILL.md. No evidence found for prompt injection, data exfiltration, or unauthorized network, filesystem, or environment access.

Static analysis reported many weak cryptography alerts, but review found no cryptographic code or malicious intent. The alerts are false positives from UX and data wording, while the only real risk surface is a local Python script documented for user execution.

All 57 static findings are false positives. The analyzer misidentified Python's random module for persona name selection as cryptographic code. No actual cryptographic algorithms, network exfiltration, or malicious patterns exist. This is a benign UX research tool that generates personas from user data.

All 57 static findings are false positives. The analyzer misidentified Python's random module for persona name selection as cryptographic code. No actual cryptographic algorithms, network exfiltration, or malicious patterns exist. This is a benign UX research tool that generates personas from user data.

All 26 static findings are false positives. The analyzer misidentified Python's random module for persona name selection as cryptographic code. No actual security risks exist. This is a benign UX research tool.