Audit History

The markdown backtick and system reconnaissance static findings are false positives from documentation and generated text, not executable behavior. A separate high-severity semantic issue remains because eval_result.json embeds self-declared safe-to-publish audit claims that could bias automated review.

The markdown backtick and system reconnaissance static findings are false positives from documentation and generated text, not executable behavior. A separate high-severity semantic issue remains because eval_result.json embeds self-declared safe-to-publish audit claims that could bias automated review.

AI review dismissed the static weak-crypto, shell-backtick, and system-reconnaissance findings as false positives in documentation, JSON text, and Python docstrings. The skill contains local Python analytics scripts, but reviewed logic is limited to metric calculations, benchmark comparison, and recommendations with no network, filesystem write, subprocess, environment, or credential access.

All 26 static findings are false positives. Scanner misidentified docstrings as crypto code, markdown backticks as shell execution, and marketing terminology as system reconnaissance. Code contains only benign Python arithmetic for engagement and ROI calculations.

All 26 static findings are false positives. Scanner misidentified docstrings as crypto code, markdown backticks as shell execution, and marketing terminology as system reconnaissance. Code contains only benign Python arithmetic for engagement and ROI calculations.

All 8 static findings are false positives. The scanner misidentified markdown code formatting as shell execution and benign documentation text containing 'ROI' as cryptographic patterns. The codebase contains only mathematical calculations for engagement metrics and no dangerous patterns.