Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-D6390FB2

6/28/2026, 8:47:04 AM

senior-prompt-engineer security assessment v4

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
senior-prompt-engineer
Version
v4
Maintainer
alirezarezvani
Source
github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering-team/senior-prompt-engineer
Coverage
8 Files scanned · 1,162 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

AI review dismissed the weak-cryptography and reconnaissance matches as false positives caused by documentation terms, argparse descriptions, and prior evaluation text. The skill includes Python CLI stubs and markdown command examples, but I found no automatic command execution, network access, credential access, cryptographic implementation, exfiltration, or prompt-injection language. Final risk is low because users should still review documented shell commands before manual use.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

8 Files scanned · 1,162 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 2 evidence locations

Capability review items (1)
Low
SKILL.md:14-23SKILL.md:167-185
Documented Shell Commands Require Manual Review
SKILL.md contains fenced markdown command examples for Python, Docker, kubectl, Helm, and related tools. They are documentation examples and are not executed by the skill, but users should review commands before running them manually.
The command text is clearly inside markdown code fences, so automatic execution risk is low. Manual command misuse remains a minor operational risk.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (1)
Low
references/agentic_system_design.md:17-21references/llm_evaluation_frameworks.md:17-21references/prompt_engineering_patterns.md:17-21scripts/prompt_optimizer.py:70-71scripts/rag_evaluator.py:70-71scripts/agent_orchestrator.py:70-71evaluation_output.json:14-18
Static Weak-Crypto And Reconnaissance Matches Dismissed
The flagged locations are prose or harmless parser descriptions, not cryptographic code or reconnaissance behavior. Examples include design text, resource awareness language, and argparse descriptions. No network scanning, weak crypto implementation, or exfiltration behavior was found.
The reviewed locations contain markdown prose, argparse setup, or previous audit text. I found no crypto APIs, scanning logic, network calls, or data exfiltration patterns.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable