Skills tech-writing-proofread
📦

tech-writing-proofread

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Proofread English Technical Documents

Technical drafts can contain language errors and inconsistent terminology that make instructions harder to follow. This skill provides specific corrections, reasons, and issue counts while preserving the authorial voice.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "tech-writing-proofread" from https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Test it

Using "tech-writing-proofread". The system call the callback. Examples are available on github.

Expected outcome:

  • 1. [Grammar] Original: The system call the callback. Suggestion: The system calls the callback. Reason: Singular subject requires calls.
  • 2. [Proper noun] Original: github. Suggestion: GitHub. Reason: Use official product casing.
  • Statistics: 2 items; grammar 1, proper noun 1.

Using "tech-writing-proofread". Register a callback function. The callback function handles errors. The callback handles completion. Simply invoke the handler.

Expected outcome:

  • 1. [Terminology] Original: The callback handles completion. Suggestion: The callback function handles completion. Reason: Use the most frequent term consistently.
  • 2. [Style] Original: Simply invoke the handler. Suggestion: Invoke the handler. Reason: Remove filler.
  • Statistics: 2 items; terminology 1, style 1.

Security Audit

Safe
v1 • 10/6/2026 Open versioned report

All six static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks and plain-text example fences. No evidence found of executable commands, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
57
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

alapha888. (2026). tech-writing-proofread security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/audits/1

BibTeX citation

@techreport{alapha888-alapha888-tech-writing-proofread-2026, author = {alapha888}, title = {tech-writing-proofread security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "tech-writing-proofread security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "alapha888" date-released: "2026-10-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-tech-writing-proofread/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:alapha888-tech-writing-proofread:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
65
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Review a README

Find language errors, inconsistent product casing, and unclear procedural wording before publishing repository documentation.

Check an API reference

Review terminology, grammatical precision, acronym expansion, and parallel headings without changing technical claims.

Polish a technical tutorial

Identify filler words, sentence errors, and inconsistent instructions while preserving a conversational voice.

Try These Prompts

Proofread a short passage
Proofread this English technical passage: [paste text]. Return an Original / Suggestion / Reason checklist and issue counts.
Review README instructions
Proofread this README in one pass: [paste README]. Check grammar, product casing, inline code formatting, and numbered steps. Preserve the existing voice.
Check API terminology
Review this API reference: [paste reference]. Build a terminology list and flag inconsistent names, nonparallel headings, and unexpanded acronyms. Mark uncertain claims [verify].
Audit a complete tutorial
Proofread this complete tutorial: [paste tutorial]. Check all six review categories, preserve its conversational tone, and avoid paragraph rewrites. Cite lines or short quotes. End with category counts.

Best Practices

  • Provide the complete document so terminology and tone can be checked consistently.
  • Identify whether the draft is a tutorial, API reference, blog post, or README.
  • Review each suggestion and confirm items marked [verify] before applying changes.

Avoid

  • Requesting complete paragraph rewrites instead of specific proofreading suggestions.
  • Treating suspected factual errors as verified corrections.
  • Requesting repeated polishing passes without a defined stopping point.

Frequently Asked Questions

What kinds of documents does this skill review?
It reviews English technical documents, including READMEs, tutorials, API references, and technical blog drafts.
Does it rewrite my document?
No. It provides specific corrections and reasons while preserving the existing voice and avoiding complete paragraph rewrites.
Does it check technical accuracy?
It flags suspected factual errors for verification. It does not establish technical correctness or silently change uncertain claims.
How does it handle inconsistent terminology?
It identifies multiple names for the same concept and recommends the most frequent form in the document.
What does the output include?
An Original / Suggestion / Reason checklist, line numbers or short quotes, verification flags, and issue counts by category.
Which AI tools are supported?
The report lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code as supported tools.

Developer Details

Author

alapha888

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Ref

9bbb9af75d2f5ea5acb8fac5aec75713670a067f

Maintenance freshness

10/6/2026

Usage

0 downloads · 0 views

File structure

📄 SKILL.md