Audit History

Most static findings are false positives from defensive selectors, ATT&CK labels, citations, Markdown fences, and SIEM query examples. One network finding is confirmed because the deployment example performs an authenticated request. Separate findings cover disabled TLS verification, administrator placeholders, and unpinned dependencies.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Sigma rule examples, MITRE ATT&CK references, public documentation links, and SIEM query snippets. I found one contextual issue: a deployment example uses placeholder administrator credentials and disables TLS verification, which should be revised before publication. No prompt injection or malicious execution instructions were found in the reviewed files.

Most static hits are false positives caused by Sigma detection examples, ATT&CK labels, markdown command snippets, and reference links. One real documentation risk remains in the Splunk deployment example because it pairs placeholder credentials with disabled TLS verification. No prompt injection or malicious data-exfiltration intent was found in the reviewed skill files.

Most static hits are false positives caused by Sigma detection examples, ATT&CK labels, markdown command snippets, and reference links. One real documentation risk remains in the Splunk deployment example because it pairs placeholder credentials with disabled TLS verification. No prompt injection or malicious data-exfiltration intent was found in the reviewed skill files.

Static analysis reported many critical and high indicators, but most are false positives caused by Sigma detection examples, ATT&CK terminology, markdown command snippets, and reference URLs. One real documentation risk remains: a Splunk deployment example uses placeholder credentials and disables TLS verification. No confirmed malicious intent or prompt injection attempt was found, so publication is acceptable with a security warning.