Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-D13D19EC

6/28/2026, 5:22:49 AM

dast-nuclei security assessment v6

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
dast-nuclei
Version
v6
Maintainer
AgentSecOps
Coverage
11 Files scanned · 4,315 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Medium

4 confirmed security findings require attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis found many command, network, filesystem, environment, and script patterns. Review shows these are mostly expected for an authorized DAST/Nuclei security skill and its examples, with no evidence of hidden exfiltration or prompt injection. The skill should publish with warnings because users can run network scans, handle credentials, and copy one risky CI installer pattern.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

11 Files scanned · 4,315 Lines analyzed

5 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Observed in 2 evidence locations

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (4)

RISK-001 Medium
Authorized Network Scanning Risk
TRUE_POSITIVE for network behavior. The skill instructs users to run Nuclei against URLs and APIs, which is expected for DAST but can affect third-party or production systems if scope and rate limits are wrong.
The cited instructions and workflow target live URLs. This is legitimate for a DAST skill, but the operational risk is real without authorization and throttling.
RISK-002 Medium
External Command Execution Is Core Workflow
TRUE_POSITIVE for command execution, with legitimate intent. The skill teaches users to run nuclei, Python helpers, and CI commands; these commands are visible examples rather than hidden execution.
The command patterns are directly present and aligned with the stated scanning purpose. I found no evidence that the skill silently executes them without user action.
RISK-003 Medium
Credential And Sensitive Endpoint Handling
TRUE_POSITIVE for credential and sensitive-data handling. The skill includes authenticated scan examples, environment-variable tokens, and templates for exposed configuration paths such as environment files.
The examples are clearly intended for authorized testing and secret detection. They still require careful handling because scan output may contain credentials or sensitive endpoints.
RISK-004 Medium
Pipe-To-Shell Installer In CI Template
TRUE_POSITIVE for a risky CI pattern. The CI template includes a curl-to-bash installer for a security tool, which can execute remote code during a workflow if copied without pinning or verification.
The pipe-to-shell pattern is directly present. It is in an optional CI template, so it is not proof of malicious intent, but it is a concrete supply-chain risk.
Needs review findings (1)
REVIEW-001 Low
GitHub Token Use Is Standard CI Context
NEEDS_REVIEW for CI token exposure. The workflow references GitHub-provided tokens for actions such as SARIF upload and PR comments, which is normal but should remain least-privileged.
The token references are visible in CI templates and not exfiltrated. Permission settings and copied workflows still need human review in each repository.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (2)
Low
Hardcoded URLs Are Placeholders
FALSE_POSITIVE for malicious network destinations. The hardcoded URLs are documentation examples, default staging targets, or upstream documentation links rather than covert endpoints.
The cited URLs are example targets or public security references. I found no evidence that data is sent to an author-controlled collection endpoint.
Low
Educational Vulnerable-Code Examples
FALSE_POSITIVE for script injection and weak-pattern alerts. The XSS, SQL injection, weak crypto, and attack-technique mentions appear in educational examples and mappings for security detection.
The file context labels these snippets as vulnerable examples or framework mappings. They are not active exploit code invoked by the skill.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable