Skills review-my-diff
๐Ÿ“ฆ

review-my-diff

v1.0 Content revision r1 Safe โš™๏ธ External commands

Review Your Git Changes Before a Pull Request

Unreviewed changes can hide correctness, security, and compatibility problems. This skill guides an evidence-based review with prioritized findings and clearly reported validation results.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it ๐Ÿฅ‰ 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "review-my-diff" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Test it

Using "review-my-diff". Review a change that suppresses save errors and reports success.

Expected outcome:

  • Intent: simplify the save workflow.
  • Checks run: none; the project checks were not available.
  • Blocker: the error path reports success after a failed save, misleading callers. Preserve failure propagation.
  • Questions for the author: should callers retry failed saves?
  • Recommendation: ready after fixes because save failures must remain observable.

Using "review-my-diff". Review a small refactor with passing checks and no traced defects.

Expected outcome:

  • Intent: remove duplicate validation while preserving behavior.
  • Checks run: existing tests, lint, and type checks passed.
  • Blockers: nothing found.
  • Should fix: nothing found.
  • Nits: nothing found.
  • Looks good: validation behavior is covered by existing tests.
  • Recommendation: ready for human review based on the inspected changes and completed checks.

Security Audit

Safe
v1 โ€ข 10/17/2026 Open versioned report

All six static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, repository inspection, or routine project checks. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential collection, exfiltration, or destructive instructions. Project checks execute repository code and should run only with appropriate trust and permissions.

1
Files scanned
56
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

โš™๏ธ External commands (3)
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)

APA citation

agentkitco. (2026). review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/1

BibTeX citation

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-review-my-diff-2026, author = {agentkitco}, title = {review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/1}, note = {Author version 1.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "1.0" type: report authors: - name: "agentkitco" date-released: "2026-10-17" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:agentkitco-review-my-diff:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
65
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Check Local Changes

Review staged and unstaged edits for concrete defects before preparing a pull request.

Prepare a Branch for Review

Compare a feature branch with its base and identify compatibility risks, missing tests, and unrelated changes.

Prioritize Review Findings

Separate merge blockers from optional cleanup and document verification gaps before requesting human review.

Try These Prompts

Review My Local Edits
Review my staged and unstaged changes. Report concrete issues with file and line evidence, and do not edit files.
Review My Feature Branch
Review this branch against the default branch using the merge base. State the intent, rank findings, and finish with a readiness recommendation.
Check Risky Behavior and Tests
Review my diff for input validation, authorization, error handling, and missing tests. Run quick existing checks and distinguish verified issues from suspicions.
Review a Large Compatibility Change
Review this branch by directory, tracing risky changes through callers, configuration, migrations, and tests. Report coverage gaps, verification limits, and merge blockers without editing.

Best Practices

  • Specify the intended behavior and comparison branch before starting the review.
  • Run project checks only in a trusted environment with appropriate permissions.
  • Require file and line evidence, consequences, and clear disclosure of unverified checks.

Avoid

  • Treating a readiness recommendation as approval to merge.
  • Requesting vague style criticism without concrete evidence.
  • Executing checks from an untrusted repository with unrestricted credentials or permissions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which changes can this skill review?
It covers staged changes, unstaged changes, and branch differences calculated from a merge base.
Will it edit my files?
The instructions prohibit editing files unless requested. Project checks can still create artifacts or other side effects.
Does it run tests automatically?
It asks the assistant to run existing tests, lint, and type checks when quick, and disclose skipped checks.
How are findings prioritized?
The report separates blockers, recommended fixes, and optional nits, with positive observations and questions for the author.
Can it handle a large diff?
It instructs the assistant to review large diffs by directory and disclose that approach.
Does a ready recommendation approve my pull request?
No. The skill explicitly prohibits approval and provides a readiness recommendation with supporting reasons.

Developer Details

Author

agentkitco

License

MIT

Author version

v1.0

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author-declared version is not valid SemVer.

Ref

743429f75b17204d47661a86b577a575ad67517f

Maintenance freshness

10/17/2026

Usage

0 downloads ยท 0 views

File structure

๐Ÿ“„ SKILL.md

More from agentkitco

View all
View all