Skills interview-me Audit History
📦

Audit History

interview-me - 2 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v2 LatestSep 19, 2026, 12:31 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Aug 30, 2026, 01:28 PM 1 confirmed0Baseline

Sep 19, 2026, 12:31 PM

All 24 static findings are false positives. The external-command matches are Markdown backticks, fenced examples, or prose, and the blocker matches describe interview guidance rather than system reconnaissance.

1
Files scanned
226
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Aug 30, 2026, 01:28 PM

All 24 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks and ordinary requirements language. No command execution or system reconnaissance capability was found. The interview method can bias user decisions through leading questions.

1
Files scanned
226
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Leading Interview Guidance Can Bias Decisions
The skill directs agents to use leading questions and attach a hypothesis to each question. This can steer users toward the agent’s assumptions during high-impact decisions.
The instructions explicitly endorse leading questions and discuss user agreeableness. The effect is contextual rather than technical, so the finding is limited to undue influence risk.
Audited by: claude