# Review Water Rights and Fishing Evidence

Historical water and fishing records are hard to classify consistently. This skill guides evidence review, citation capture, and structured batch submission.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add acskamloops/water-rights-fishing
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: acskamloops-water-rights-fishing
- Skillstore revision: r1
- Version status: missing
- Tree hash: 4f861fc4978d8fec80ced19cdbe0b57ec92ef82cdc5160b3f9370ffb18e898f7
- Author: ACSKamloops
- GitHub username: ACSKamloops
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/ACSKamloops/shs-engine/tree/master/.codex/skills/water-rights-fishing
- Ref: c1fdca50ff516318f65fed0d7f9e82797c5171dc
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: confirmation\_required
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: external\_commands
- Quality score: 38
- Quality tier: warning
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/acskamloops-water-rights-fishing
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/acskamloops-water-rights-fishing/manifest

## Capabilities

- Fetches Water\_Rights\_Fishing batches through the local refinement workflow.
- Guides manual reading of JSON task files before analysis.
- Defines relevance criteria for licenses, ditches, creeks, and fishing restrictions.
- Specifies structured analysis fields for batch results.
- Lists validation checks before submitting a completed batch.
- Describes flagging workflows for irrelevant, OCR, and provenance issues.

## Use Cases

- Classify Water Evidence: Review batch text for water licenses, irrigation ditches, riparian rights, and creek access evidence.
- Extract Fishing Restrictions: Capture factual references to fishing bans, river access, and Thompson River restrictions with citations.
- Prepare Review Batches: Validate metadata, reliability values, OCR status, and exception flags before manager review.

## Prompt Templates

### Review a Batch

```
Use the water-rights-fishing skill to review one Water_Rights_Fishing batch. Identify relevant water, irrigation, riparian, and fishing evidence.
```

### Extract Key Evidence

```
Review the task text manually. For each relevant item, capture the document title, date, factual summary, and verbatim evidence with page references.
```

### Validate a Submission

```
Check my draft batch analysis against the skill rules. Flag missing metadata, weak citations, forbidden opinion words, and short factual descriptions.
```

### Handle Exceptions

```
Assess these tasks for provenance failure, OCR failure, or irrelevance. Recommend the correct flag reason and explain the factual basis.
```

## Limitations

- Requires the local repository workflow scripts and task files.
- Does not replace legal advice or manager review.
- Depends on OCR quality and available source metadata.
- Does not independently verify records outside the provided task data.

## Best Practices

- Read the complete task text before deciding relevance.
- Use verbatim quotes and page anchors for important evidence.
- Validate metadata, controlled values, and banned words before submission.

## Anti Patterns

- Do not classify records by keyword search alone.
- Do not add legal conclusions or unsupported opinions.
- Do not submit batches before provenance and manager-review checks.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-07-06T00:34:42.813\+00:00
- Summary: Most static findings are Markdown inline-code or fence false positives, but several workflow commands are real external execution. The skill also contains a high-confidence prompt-injection risk by treating JSON task system\_instructions as hard constraints.

## Stats

- Views: 199
- Downloads: 12
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0
