Audit History

Version	Date	Result	Change vs previous
v8 Latest	Jul 6, 2026, 12:36 AM	No confirmed findings	No capability change
v7	Jul 6, 2026, 12:36 AM	No confirmed findings	Network access
v6	Jun 28, 2026, 03:51 AM	No confirmed findings	External commandsNetwork access
v5	Jan 16, 2026, 02:11 PM	No confirmed findings	No capability change
v4	Jan 16, 2026, 02:11 PM	No confirmed findings	External commandsNetwork access
v3	Jan 10, 2026, 09:51 AM	No confirmed findings	No capability change
v2	Jan 10, 2026, 09:51 AM	No confirmed findings	No capability change
v1	Jan 10, 2026, 09:51 AM	No confirmed findings	Baseline

Jul 6, 2026, 12:36 AM

The static findings are false positives caused by ordinary marketing language and copywriting examples. I found no evidence of executable networking, system reconnaissance, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.

2

Files scanned

88

Lines analyzed

1

Review items

0

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

🌐 Network access (1)

reference.md:19

Audited by: codex

Audit version 7

Jul 6, 2026, 12:36 AM

The static findings are false positives caused by ordinary marketing language and copywriting examples. I found no evidence of executable networking, system reconnaissance, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.

2

Files scanned

88

Lines analyzed

1

Review items

0

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

🌐 Network access (1)

reference.md:19

Audited by: codex

Audit version 6

Jun 28, 2026, 03:51 AM

Static findings were reviewed and dismissed as false positives from prose, markdown examples, and marketing wording. No executable code, network calls, system reconnaissance, weak cryptography, or prompt injection attempts were found in the reviewed files.

2

Files scanned

88

Lines analyzed

0

Review items

6

False positives ignored

Static false positives ignored (6)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low

reference.md:11

False Positive: Markdown Fence Flagged as Command Execution

Static analysis flagged reference.md line 11 as Ruby or shell backtick execution. The line starts a markdown example block and does not execute commands.

The surrounding lines are a documentation template example, not runnable shell or Ruby code. No command interpreter or user input path is present.

Low

reference.md:19

False Positive: Marketing Text Flagged as Network Use

Static analysis flagged reference.md line 19 for Python HTTP libraries. The line is marketing copy about handling requests, not a network API call.

The text is inside a value proposition list and contains no imports, URLs, sockets, or HTTP client usage. It has no operational network behavior.

Low

reference.md:17

False Positive: Heading Flagged as Reconnaissance

Static analysis flagged reference.md line 17 as system reconnaissance. The line is a copywriting section heading for a value proposition grid.

The line is documentation prose and does not call system utilities or collect host information. No reconnaissance behavior is present.

Low

reference.md:25

False Positive: Editing Checklist Flagged as Reconnaissance

Static analysis flagged reference.md line 25 as system reconnaissance. The line is a writing checklist item about removing vague marketing terms.

The line is a natural-language editing instruction with no file, process, host, or environment inspection. It cannot perform reconnaissance.

Low

SKILL.md:3

False Positive: Copywriting Phrase Flagged as Weak Cryptography

Static analysis flagged SKILL.md line 3 as a weak cryptographic algorithm. The line is the skill description and contains no cryptographic code.

The line is YAML front matter describing copywriting capabilities. It has no hash, cipher, crypto import, or security-sensitive operation.

Low

SKILL.md:11

False Positive: Tone Guidance Flagged as Reconnaissance

Static analysis flagged SKILL.md line 11 as system reconnaissance. The line is tone guidance for writing in a human, approachable style.

The content is copywriting guidance, not an instruction to inspect the system. No command, file access, or host information collection exists.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Audited by: codex

Audit version 5

Jan 16, 2026, 02:11 PM

Pure prompt-based copywriting skill with no executable code. Contains only writing instructions, voice guidelines, and template structures. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities. All 15 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES caused by pattern-matching on benign content like markdown templates, hash values, and standard copywriting terminology.

3

Files scanned

268

Lines analyzed

2

Review items

0

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (1)

reference.md:11-15

🌐 Network access (1)

reference.md:19

Audited by: claude

Audit version 4

Jan 16, 2026, 02:11 PM

Pure prompt-based copywriting skill with no executable code. Contains only writing instructions, voice guidelines, and template structures. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities. All 15 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES caused by pattern-matching on benign content like markdown templates, hash values, and standard copywriting terminology.

3

Files scanned

268

Lines analyzed

2

Review items

0

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (1)

reference.md:11-15

🌐 Network access (1)

reference.md:19

Audited by: claude

Audit version 3

Jan 10, 2026, 09:51 AM

Pure prompt-based copywriting skill with no executable code. Contains only writing instructions, voice guidelines, and template structures. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities.

2

Files scanned

88

Lines analyzed

0

Review items

0

False positives ignored

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Audited by: claude

Audit version 2

Jan 10, 2026, 09:51 AM

Pure prompt-based copywriting skill with no executable code. Contains only writing instructions, voice guidelines, and template structures. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities.

2

Files scanned

88

Lines analyzed

0

Review items

0

False positives ignored

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Audited by: claude

Audit version 1

Jan 10, 2026, 09:51 AM

Pure prompt-based copywriting skill with no executable code. Contains only writing instructions, voice guidelines, and template structures. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities.

2

Files scanned

88

Lines analyzed

0

Review items

0

False positives ignored

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Audited by: claude

Version comparison

Risk Factors

Risk Factors

Risk Factors

Risk Factors