Skills report-generator Audit History
πŸ“¦

Audit History

report-generator - 5 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v5 LatestJul 12, 2026, 01:48 PM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v4 Jul 12, 2026, 01:48 PM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v3 Jul 7, 2026, 06:37 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jul 6, 2026, 06:53 PM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v1 Jul 4, 2026, 04:20 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 12, 2026, 01:48 PM

All 38 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown links, code fences, inline code, metadata URLs, or ordinary reporting language. One medium semantic risk remains because the skill directs agents to persist campaign reports and selected metrics in shared memory without requesting confirmation.

2
Files scanned
637
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Campaign Data Persisted Without Confirmation
The skill directs agents to save reports and promote ROI, creator decisions, and campaign learnings into shared memory without checking sensitivity or user consent.
The persistence instructions and target paths are explicit. The impact depends on host memory scope and whether campaign data is confidential.
Audited by: codex

Jul 12, 2026, 01:48 PM

All 38 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown links, code fences, inline code, metadata URLs, or ordinary reporting language. One medium semantic risk remains because the skill directs agents to persist campaign reports and selected metrics in shared memory without requesting confirmation.

2
Files scanned
637
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Campaign Data Persisted Without Confirmation
The skill directs agents to save reports and promote ROI, creator decisions, and campaign learnings into shared memory without checking sensitivity or user consent.
The persistence instructions and target paths are explicit. The impact depends on host memory scope and whether campaign data is confidential.
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 06:37 AM

No confirmed malicious behavior was found in the reviewed files. Static findings are explained by Markdown code fences, inline formatting, source metadata URLs, relative documentation links, and fixed memory output paths.

2
Files scanned
637
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 6, 2026, 06:53 PM

Static findings were false positives after context review. The apparent command, network, reconnaissance, and traversal signals are Markdown links, metadata, examples, or report-writing prose. One medium semantic risk remains because the dynamic report filename lacks an explicit slugging and path containment rule.

2
Files scanned
644
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Unvalidated Dynamic Report Filename
The save instruction uses `YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md` without saying to slug the topic or reject path separators. A crafted topic could redirect the output outside the intended memory folder if the host follows it literally.
The line clearly defines a dynamic filename, but the exact source of `<topic>` and host path safeguards are not shown. I kept this as a medium-confidence context finding.
Audited by: codex

Jul 4, 2026, 04:20 PM

All static findings were adjudicated as false positives caused by Markdown links, code fences, inline backticks, homepage metadata, and report-template wording. I found no evidence of prompt injection, credential access, command execution, unsafe network calls, or malicious file-system behavior in the reviewed files.

2
Files scanned
644
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex