Audit History
paid-measurement-loop - 8 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v8 Latest | Jul 27, 2026, 11:36 AM | 1 confirmed | 1 | No capability change |
| v7 | Jul 13, 2026, 02:23 PM | No confirmed findings | 2 | No capability change |
| v6 | Jul 13, 2026, 02:23 PM | No confirmed findings | 2 | No capability change |
| v5 | Jul 12, 2026, 01:21 PM | No confirmed findings | 1 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 6, 2026, 06:18 PM | 1 confirmed | 1 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 9, 2026, 12:15 PM | No confirmed findings | 2 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jul 6, 2026, 06:18 PM | 1 confirmed | 1 | No capability change |
| v1 | Jul 4, 2026, 04:17 PM | No confirmed findings | 1 | Baseline |
Jul 27, 2026, 11:36 AM
Most static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown code formatting and static repository links. One instructed ledger command interpolates a campaign placeholder into a shell command, and the result filename convention lacks a campaign-name sanitization rule. No prompt injection, credential collection, or unauthorized network behavior was found.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (18)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (14)
Jul 13, 2026, 02:23 PM
Thirty-four static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, repository links, metadata URLs, or ordinary analysis prose. The line 62 command risks shell injection through an unquoted campaign value. The line 71 save rule risks path traversal through an unsanitized campaign filename.
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (12)
Jul 13, 2026, 02:23 PM
Thirty-four static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, repository links, metadata URLs, or ordinary analysis prose. The line 62 command risks shell injection through an unquoted campaign value. The line 71 save rule risks path traversal through an unsanitized campaign filename.
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (12)
Jul 12, 2026, 01:21 PM
Thirty-five static findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, repository-relative links, metadata URLs, and ordinary campaign terminology. The line 62 ledger command is confirmed because its unquoted campaign placeholder could permit shell argument or command injection.
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (12)
Jul 6, 2026, 06:18 PM
Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code, metadata URLs, and fixed relative documentation links. One real medium-risk issue remains: the skill instructs the agent to run a local ledger command with user-controlled campaign data. A semantic review also found that saved filenames should sanitize campaign names before writing to memory.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (13)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (12)
Jul 9, 2026, 12:15 PM
Most static alerts are false positives from Markdown backticks, static documentation links, and marketing workflow language. Two external command instructions are confirmed because they direct the agent to run local Python helper scripts on campaign data. No prompt injection or data exfiltration intent was found.
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (12)
Jul 6, 2026, 06:18 PM
Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code, metadata URLs, and fixed relative documentation links. One real medium-risk issue remains: the skill instructs the agent to run a local ledger command with user-controlled campaign data. A semantic review also found that saved filenames should sanitize campaign names before writing to memory.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
βοΈ External commands (13)
π Network access (2)
π Filesystem access (12)
Jul 4, 2026, 04:17 PM
The skill is primarily instructional Markdown. Most static alerts are false positives caused by inline code formatting, homepage metadata, and relative repository links. One external command pattern is confirmed at SKILL.md line 60 because the skill instructs agents to call a local ledger helper, which should require user confirmation and safe argument handling.
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.