πŸ“¦

Audit History

content-amplifier - 7 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v7 LatestJul 26, 2026, 10:04 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jul 26, 2026, 10:04 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v5 Jul 13, 2026, 12:35 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jul 13, 2026, 12:35 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jul 12, 2026, 11:28 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jul 6, 2026, 04:03 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jul 4, 2026, 03:46 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 26, 2026, 10:04 AM

All 81 static detections are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, relative documentation links, marketing terminology, and declarative URLs. The skill contains instructional content for paid amplification and content reuse; it does not execute commands, access arbitrary files, perform network requests, or conduct host reconnaissance. No prompt-injection or intent-level security issue was found.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jul 26, 2026, 10:04 AM

All 81 static detections are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, relative documentation links, marketing terminology, and declarative URLs. The skill contains instructional content for paid amplification and content reuse; it does not execute commands, access arbitrary files, perform network requests, or conduct host reconnaissance. No prompt-injection or intent-level security issue was found.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jul 13, 2026, 12:35 PM

All 81 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, repository links, metadata URLs, or paid-media terminology. The skill contains no executable commands, prompt injection, hidden network behavior, or unsafe path handling.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 13, 2026, 12:35 PM

All 81 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, repository links, metadata URLs, or paid-media terminology. The skill contains no executable commands, prompt injection, hidden network behavior, or unsafe path handling.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 12, 2026, 11:28 AM

All 79 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown links, backticks, code fences, marketing terms, and repository metadata. No shell execution, path traversal, unauthorized network request, prompt injection, or system reconnaissance is present.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 6, 2026, 04:03 PM

The static alerts are false positives from Markdown examples, local documentation links, marketing terminology, and metadata. I found no prompt injection attempt, command execution instruction, arbitrary filesystem access, or automatic network exfiltration in the reviewed files.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 4, 2026, 03:46 PM

All 79 static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The flagged command, filesystem, network, and blocker patterns occur inside Markdown examples, relative documentation links, connector placeholders, or repository metadata; no executable code, unauthorized network behavior, secret access, or prompt injection evidence was found.

3
Files scanned
857
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex