Audit History
budget-optimizer - 4 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
Jul 12, 2026, 11:00 AM
All 34 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code, relative documentation links, marketing terminology, and repository metadata URLs. No shell execution, network request, system reconnaissance, or executable path traversal is present. One medium contextual risk remains because the output filename includes an unconstrained topic value.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
π Filesystem access (16)
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
Jul 12, 2026, 11:00 AM
All 34 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code, relative documentation links, marketing terminology, and repository metadata URLs. No shell execution, network request, system reconnaissance, or executable path traversal is present. One medium contextual risk remains because the output filename includes an unconstrained topic value.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
π Filesystem access (16)
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
Jul 6, 2026, 03:30 PM
I found no confirmed security issues after reviewing the flagged lines. The static findings are Markdown examples, internal documentation links, connector labels, and repository metadata rather than executable commands, path traversal, reconnaissance, or network calls. No prompt injection text was found in the reviewed files.
Risk Factors
π Filesystem access (16)
βοΈ External commands (14)
π Network access (2)
Jul 4, 2026, 03:57 PM
All 34 static findings are false positives after context review. The flagged items are Markdown examples, repository links, homepage metadata, and marketing planning language, with no executable command, path traversal, data exfiltration, or prompt injection evidence.