Audit History

All 35 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, relative documentation links, metadata, or the decimal alpha notation. The sole documented command runs a fixed local statistical helper and contains no evidence of network access, arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration, or prompt injection. The skill also explicitly treats exported CSV content as untrusted data and requires consent before saving results.

All 35 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, relative documentation links, metadata, or the decimal alpha notation. The sole documented command runs a fixed local statistical helper and contains no evidence of network access, arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration, or prompt injection. The skill also explicitly treats exported CSV content as untrusted data and requires consent before saving results.

All 35 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, fixed repository links, decimal notation, and homepage metadata. The command example invokes a fixed local statistical helper with numeric inputs; no injection, arbitrary traversal, credential use, or exfiltration intent appears.

All 35 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown syntax, fixed repository links, decimal notation, and homepage metadata. The command example invokes a fixed local statistical helper with numeric inputs; no injection, arbitrary traversal, credential use, or exfiltration intent appears.

Most static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown code formatting and relative links to repository documentation. The skill also recommends an unaudited Python helper and can persist test summaries after consent, so those behaviors remain disclosed.

The command and network findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting and repository metadata. The path traversal findings are fixed documentation links, and I found no command execution, data exfiltration, arbitrary file access, or prompt injection intent.

Most static alerts are false positives from markdown code fences, relative repository links, and homepage metadata. I confirmed three medium-risk command-invocation instructions for a local experiment.py helper; no prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or malicious network behavior was found.

The command and network findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting and repository metadata. The path traversal findings are fixed documentation links, and I found no command execution, data exfiltration, arbitrary file access, or prompt injection intent.

Static alerts are false positives from Markdown links, fenced examples, inline placeholders, and repository metadata; I found no shell execution or network call. One semantic issue remains: the optional memory filename includes a topic value without sanitization guidance, which could create unsafe paths in permissive hosts.