content-evaluation-framework
Evaluate Educational Content with a Rubric
Educational drafts need consistent review before publication. This skill applies a weighted rubric and constitution checklist to produce evidence-based feedback.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "content-evaluation-framework" from https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "content-evaluation-framework". A writer asks for a review of a completed lesson about Python functions.
Expected outcome:
Overall result: Good. The lesson is technically sound and well structured, but the AI-first teaching section needs stronger guided practice. Recommended next steps include adding one co-learning exercise and simplifying two long explanations.
Using "content-evaluation-framework". A program lead asks whether a chapter can enter validation.
Expected outcome:
Verdict: Not ready for validation. Constitution compliance is incomplete because several required evidence items are missing. Resolve the gate items before using the weighted score as a publication signal.
Using "content-evaluation-framework". An editor asks for a quick spot check on one section.
Expected outcome:
Focused review: The section has clear examples and a logical flow. The main risk is dense language, so revise long paragraphs before a full completion review.
Security Audit
SafeAll static findings were adjudicated as false positives after reviewing the cited context. The apparent command, reconnaissance, and sensitive-file matches are Markdown fences, inline paths, readability metrics, and checklist text. No semantic prompt injection, data exfiltration, or hidden unsafe intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (21)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework/audits/6?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
92Bilal26. (2026). content-evaluation-framework security audit report (audit version 6) [Author version 2.1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework/audits/6BibTeX citation
@techreport{92bilal26-92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework-2026,
author = {92Bilal26},
title = {content-evaluation-framework security audit report (audit version 6)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {6},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework/audits/6},
note = {Author version 2.1.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "content-evaluation-framework security audit report (audit version 6)"
version: "2.1.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "92Bilal26"
date-released: "2026-07-05"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework/audits/6"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:92bilal26-content-evaluation-framework:audit:6"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Review a Lesson Draft
Assess a lesson before publication and identify the most important revisions.
Standardize Editorial Feedback
Use the same rubric across chapters so feedback remains consistent and traceable.
Gate Validation Readiness
Check whether content meets minimum quality and constitution requirements before validation.
Try These Prompts
Evaluate this lesson draft using the content evaluation framework. Focus on the strongest issues and the most important fixes. Content path: [path].
Review this completed chapter with the full rubric and constitution checklist. Provide category scores, evidence, strengths, weaknesses, and prioritized next steps. Content path: [path].
Determine whether this content is ready for validation. Apply the pass or fail constitution gate first, then calculate the weighted quality score. Content path: [path].
Evaluate this content with the framework, using the provided spec, plan, learning objectives, and target audience. Call out any rubric assumptions that may need adjustment. Content path: [path]. Context paths: [paths].
Best Practices
- Provide the draft, learning objectives, and relevant project context together.
- Ask for line-referenced evidence so feedback is traceable.
- Use the same rubric across drafts to compare improvement.
Avoid
- Using the framework as a substitute for subject matter expert review.
- Treating incomplete drafts as final publication decisions.
- Ignoring a failed constitution gate because the weighted score is high.
Frequently Asked Questions
What content can this skill review?
Does it produce a numeric score?
Can it review partial drafts?
Does it replace a human editor?
What inputs improve the review quality?
Can it be used with Claude, Codex, and Claude Code?
Developer Details
Author
92Bilal26License
MIT
Author version
v2.1.0
Skillstore revision
r1
Repository
https://github.com/92Bilal26/TaskPilotAI/tree/main/.claude/skills/content-evaluation-frameworkRef
c4037264bbd363c572662d6154a3ab28f5ca4f53
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
13 downloads · 265 views
File structure