Skills coding-standards Audit History
📦

Audit History

coding-standards - 5 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v5 LatestJul 20, 2026, 05:15 PM No confirmed findings0External commands
v4 Jun 27, 2026, 04:35 PM No confirmed findings0 External commands
v3 Jan 16, 2026, 11:58 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jan 16, 2026, 11:58 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v1 Jan 10, 2026, 09:08 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jun 27, 2026, 04:35 PM

Static analysis reported many external command and weak cryptography patterns, but review found they are false positives from Markdown code fences, inline TypeScript identifiers, and ordinary example text. No executable scripts, network calls, credential access, prompt injection, or malicious intent were found in SKILL.md. The skill is safe to publish as documentation-only coding guidance.

1
Files scanned
436
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False positive external command detections
The external command detections occur inside Markdown code fences and inline TypeScript examples, such as component structure, hooks, imports, and commit-message formatting. They are documentation examples and are not executed by the skill.
The reviewed locations are Markdown examples and headings, not runnable skill code. No shell invocation, dynamic execution, or instruction to run commands is present.
Low
False positive weak cryptography detections
The weak cryptography detections are caused by unrelated text fragments in the description and TypeScript examples. No cryptographic API, hash function, encryption routine, or password handling logic appears in the skill.
The flagged lines contain prose or ordinary test/example code, not crypto usage. There is no evidence of MD5, SHA1, DES, or similar weak algorithms being used.
Low
False positive reconnaissance detections
The reconnaissance detections map to TypeScript sample code and documentation text, including array find examples and error handling examples. They do not gather system information or inspect a host environment.
The reviewed content is static coding guidance with no operating system commands or environment inspection. No evidence of host reconnaissance was found.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex

Jan 16, 2026, 11:58 AM

This skill contains only markdown documentation with TypeScript code examples. All 91 static findings are false positives: hash strings triggered C2/crypto keywords, mathematical formulas were misidentified as cryptographic code, and TypeScript patterns were flagged as system reconnaissance. No executable code, network calls, file system access, or environment variable usage exists.

2
Files scanned
614
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 16, 2026, 11:58 AM

This skill contains only markdown documentation with TypeScript code examples. All 91 static findings are false positives: hash strings triggered C2/crypto keywords, mathematical formulas were misidentified as cryptographic code, and TypeScript patterns were flagged as system reconnaissance. No executable code, network calls, file system access, or environment variable usage exists.

2
Files scanned
614
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 09:08 AM

This skill contains only documentation in markdown format. No executable code, scripts, network calls, filesystem access, or environment variable access. Pure reference documentation for coding standards.

1
Files scanned
436
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude