git-analysis
Analyze Git Changes
Reviewing branch changes can be slow when commits, diffs, and status are scattered. This skill gathers Git context for PRs, reviews, and commit planning.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "git-analysis" from https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "git-analysis". Analyze the current feature branch before a pull request.
Expected outcome:
Branch summary with base branch, merge base, commit count, changed files, and notable diffs.
Using "git-analysis". Review the commit history since divergence.
Expected outcome:
- A concise commit timeline.
- Potentially noisy or unclear commits.
- Suggested pull request narrative.
Using "git-analysis". Compare staged and unstaged changes before committing.
Expected outcome:
A working tree summary that separates staged changes, unstaged changes, and untracked files.
Security Audit
SafeMost static findings are expected git-analysis behavior, safe helper scripts, or Markdown command examples. The confirmed issue is a reference workflow that writes repository status and diffs to predictable /tmp/git_*.txt files. No prompt-injection text or malicious exfiltration intent was found.
Capability review items (11)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
โ๏ธ External commands (71)
๐ Filesystem access (26)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)
APA citation
1natsu172. (2026). git-analysis security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis/audits/8BibTeX citation
@techreport{1natsu172-1natsu172-git-analysis-2026,
author = {1natsu172},
title = {git-analysis security audit report (audit version 8)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {8},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis/audits/8},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "git-analysis security audit report (audit version 8)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "1natsu172"
date-released: "2026-07-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/1natsu172-git-analysis/audits/8"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:1natsu172-git-analysis:audit:8"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Prepare a Pull Request
Summarize commits, changed files, and diff statistics before drafting a pull request.
Review Feature Branches
Compare a branch against its merge base to focus review effort.
Audit Release Changes
List commit history and file impact for release notes or team handoff.
Try These Prompts
Use git-analysis to summarize the current branch against the default branch. Include commit count, changed files, and main risks.
Analyze this repository for a pull request. Group changes by area and list commits that need mention.
Use git-analysis to inspect commits from the merge base to HEAD. Highlight unclear commits and review focus areas.
Perform a deep branch analysis. Classify changes by file type, connect commits to touched areas, and identify follow-up questions.
Best Practices
- Run from the repository root or clearly state the target repository path.
- Review generated diffs before sharing because they may contain secrets.
- Verify the detected default branch when repositories use nonstandard branch names.
Avoid
- Do not run full diff analysis on repositories that contain secrets you cannot expose.
- Do not assume origin/main when the repository reports a different default branch.
- Do not use predictable temporary files from reference examples on shared systems.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this skill change my repository?
Does it need network access?
Can it create a pull request?
Does it work with Codex and Claude Code?
What data can appear in outputs?
How should I handle sensitive repositories?
Developer Details
Author
1natsu172License
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
26421118b848d9f1efc0aa169d8a7a9e7e0a877e
Maintenance freshness
7/21/2026
Usage
18 downloads ยท 183 views
File structure