Audit History

Static analysis mostly matched Markdown fences and inline code, which are false positives in this documentation-only skill. One optional bash example shows uvx ty check, which is legitimate type-checking guidance but still requires user confirmation before execution.

Static analysis mostly matched Markdown fences and inline code, which are false positives in this documentation-only skill. One optional bash example shows uvx ty check, which is legitimate type-checking guidance but still requires user confirmation before execution.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences, inline code formatting, and documentation prose. The only confirmed issue is an optional uvx ty command that can execute an external package runner. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, or system reconnaissance intent was found.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences, inline code formatting, and documentation prose. The only confirmed issue is an optional uvx ty command that can execute an external package runner. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, or system reconnaissance intent was found.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline backticks, and normal Python examples. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, or malicious intent was found. The optional `uvx ty check` example is legitimate but invokes an external tool, so agents should request user approval before running it.

Most static hits are false positives caused by Markdown code fences and inline code, not Ruby backtick execution. One command example is confirmed as medium risk because `uvx ty check` can execute external tooling if followed by an agent. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or malicious behavior was found.

Static analysis produced a high score because Markdown code fences, inline backticks, environment-variable examples, and a documentation link matched generic patterns. Review found no executable skill code, no prompt injection, and no evidence of malicious intent. Residual risk is low because the guidance includes optional external tool commands and examples that reference secret-bearing environment variables.

This is a pure documentation skill containing only markdown guidance with code examples. The static analyzer incorrectly flagged example code patterns in documentation as security issues. All reported findings are FALSE POSITIVES because the skill contains no executable code, no file system access, no network calls, and no external command execution. The flagged patterns (backticks, environment variables, API keys in examples) are educational documentation content only.

This is a pure documentation skill containing only markdown guidance with code examples. The static analyzer incorrectly flagged example code patterns in documentation as security issues. All reported findings are FALSE POSITIVES because the skill contains no executable code, no file system access, no network calls, and no external command execution. The flagged patterns (backticks, environment variables, API keys in examples) are educational documentation content only.

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown guidance. No executable code, no file system access, no network calls, and no external command execution. This skill only provides informational content when loaded by an AI agent.