История аудитов

Reviewed all 50 static findings and found they are benign uses of markdown, template text, archive creation, and validation logic. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, unauthorized network access, or malicious command execution.

Reviewed all 50 static findings and found they are benign uses of markdown, template text, archive creation, and validation logic. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, unauthorized network access, or malicious command execution.

AI review dismissed the static high and critical signals as false positives from Apache license text, Markdown examples, and validation strings. The skill does include executable Python scripts that write files and package entire directories, so publication is reasonable with a filesystem warning. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential exfiltration, network activity, or weak cryptography.

Security audit completed. All 146 static findings are false positives. Network URLs are standard Apache License references. External command patterns are documentation examples using markdown backticks. Cryptographic algorithm flags are triggered by benign 'hash' references in content validation code. Filesystem operations are legitimate skill packaging utilities. No malicious behavior detected.

Static findings mostly point to documentation examples and license text, which do not execute code or transmit data. Filesystem access is present only for packaging skills into a zip archive. No evidence of malicious intent or prompt injection was found in the scanned files.