Навыки sent-routing-strategist

📦

sent-routing-strategist

Name: sent-routing-strategist
Author: sentdm

Ревизия содержимого r1 Безопасно ⚙️ Внешние команды

Plan Sent Message Routing

Incorrect channel choices can cause duplicate deliveries, extra charges, failed fallback, and unsafe retries. This skill explains routing decisions and diagnoses outcomes from Sent evidence.

Поддерживает: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 74 Адекватно

Установить с помощью моего Агента

Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.

Запрос агента

Review the Skillstore skill "sent-routing-strategist" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.

Ресурсы для AI-агентов

Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.

Markdown-детали GET /skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.md Подписанный manifest GET /api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/manifest Подписанный lockfile GET /api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/lockfile

Протестировать

Использование «sent-routing-strategist». We want WhatsApp first and SMS only if WhatsApp fails. Should we send both channel values?

Ожидаемый результат:

Use automatic routing by omitting the channel field or selecting Sent automatic routing. Supplying both channels creates two independent messages per recipient.

Использование «sent-routing-strategist». A message shows FAILED on WhatsApp, then newer queued and delivered events on SMS.

Ожидаемый результат:

The WhatsApp route failed and automatic routing reused the same message identifier.
The newer SMS delivery is the current logical outcome.
Project state by event time and keep each route attempt in the activity history.

Использование «sent-routing-strategist». A campaign has 1,000 recipients and two channel values.

Ожидаемый результат:

The request creates 2,000 messages and potentially 2,000 charges. Confirm simultaneous delivery is intentional before sending.

Аудит безопасности

Безопасно

v1 • 02.09.2026 Открыть версионный отчет

All 33 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code spans or ordinary product troubleshooting guidance. The skill contains no executable commands, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or other semantic security concerns.

Просканировано файлов

312

Проанализировано строк

Пункты проверки

Ложные срабатывания проигнорированы

Факторы риска

⚙️ Внешние команды (20)

Последний завершенный статический и семантический аудит не обнаружил подтвержденных проблем безопасности. Это не доказывает отсутствие побочных эффектов у навыка.

Аудитор:: codex

Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет

Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.

Открыть версионный отчет

Копировать ссылку на отчёт

https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Значок Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Значок HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Встраиваемая карточка

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Цитата APA

sentdm. (2026). sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1

Цитата BibTeX

@techreport{sentdm-sentdm-sent-routing-strategist-2026,
  author = {sentdm},
  title = {sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "sentdm"
date-released: "2026-09-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:sentdm-sent-routing-strategist:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Оценка Skillstore

Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: Средний

Архитектура

Сопровождаемость

Контент

Сообщество

Соответствие спецификации

Что вы можете построить

Choose a routing mode

Select automatic routing, a pinned channel, or a deliberate broadcast before implementing a send.

Diagnose delivery outcomes

Use message status, channel, activities, and webhook history to explain unexpected routing behavior.

Review campaign cost

Calculate message volume and charges before approving a multi-recipient or multi-channel campaign.

Попробуйте эти промпты

Select a channel mode

I need to send [message type] to [audience]. Explain whether I should omit channel, use automatic routing, pin one channel, or broadcast.

Explain an unexpected outcome

My message ended with status [status] and channel [channel]. Explain the likely causes, evidence to inspect, and whether I should retry.

Trace a reroute

Review this ordered activity and webhook history: [events]. Reconstruct each route attempt and identify the current logical message state.

Audit a routing design

Evaluate this routing plan: [plan]. Check broadcast multiplication, channel constraints, fallback assumptions, retry rules, consent, status projection, and expected charges.

Лучшие практики

Prefer automatic routing unless compliance, contracts, or content require one channel.
Use activity history and current message state before classifying a failure as final.
Calculate recipients multiplied by channels before approving a multi-channel request.