devrel-content-calendar
Plan a Realistic DevRel Content Calendar
Developer-content plans slip when writing commitments ignore technical review and fixed deadlines. This skill builds quarterly publishing slots with named owners, reviewers, capacity estimates, and reserved reactive time.
Установить с помощью моего Агента
Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.
Review the Skillstore skill "devrel-content-calendar" from https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.
Ресурсы для AI-агентов
Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.
Протестировать
Использование «devrel-content-calendar». Plan Q3 for a developer tool with a week-four release, one writer, and a technical reviewer available three hours weekly.
Ожидаемый результат:
- Quarter shape: confirm whether launch visibility or long-term adoption matters most before assigning dates.
- Capacity model: estimate reviewer passes for each format and reserve 20% of estimated capacity for reactive work.
- Release coverage: schedule preparation before week four and follow-up afterward, with named owners and reviewers.
- Next input needed: team names, format estimates, audience priorities, and last quarter's shipped work.
Использование «devrel-content-calendar». Audit thirteen weekly blog slots owned by 'content team', with no reviewers, evidence, preparation work, or open capacity.
Ожидаемый результат:
- Ownership check failed: assign a specific owner and reviewer to every committed slot.
- Capacity check failed: reduce commitments to leave named reactive capacity.
- Coverage check failed: add relevant documentation and another surface, with at least two journey stages.
- Evidence check failed: attach observed demand or a written hypothesis to each topic.
- Anchor check failed: schedule preparation and follow-up around each fixed deadline.
Аудит безопасности
БезопасноBoth static findings are false positives: the evaluation prompt discusses content planning, and the backticks format a memory filename. No evidence found of reconnaissance, shell execution, exfiltration, or instructions intended to manipulate the audit in the reviewed files. Optional context persistence is part of the documented planning workflow.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (1)
Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет
Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.
Копировать ссылку на отчёт
https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportЗначок Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Значок HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Встраиваемая карточка
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Цитата APA
samber. (2026). devrel-content-calendar security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.0.1]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar/audits/1Цитата BibTeX
@techreport{samber-samber-devrel-content-calendar-2026,
author = {samber},
title = {devrel-content-calendar security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.0.1}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "devrel-content-calendar security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.0.1"
type: report
authors:
- name: "samber"
date-released: "2026-10-25"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/samber-devrel-content-calendar/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:samber-devrel-content-calendar:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Оценка Skillstore
Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: СреднийЧто вы можете построить
Plan a release-heavy quarter
Coordinate launch preparation, evergreen guides, and follow-up slots without committing all capacity to one release date.
Size a small team's publishing workload
Identify technical review constraints and replace expensive formats with work that fits available capacity.
Audit an existing community content plan
Find missing owners, unsupported topics, coverage gaps, and overloaded weeks before proposing the smallest necessary changes.
Попробуйте эти промпты
Help me plan next quarter's developer content for [product]. Ask about our audience, goals, fixed dates, and capacity before recommending a quarter shape.
We have [writer availability] and [reviewer availability] for [quarter]. Assess [proposed formats and counts], estimate production passes, and recommend cuts with named slack.
Audit this existing developer-content calendar: [calendar]. Report failed checks in damage order and propose minimal changes. Ask for missing evidence, owners, reviewers, and capacity.
Plan [quarter] around [release dates], [accepted talks], and [agency commitments]. Use [audience goals], [capacity], and [past results]. Validate each plan section before proceeding.
Лучшие практики
- Provide last quarter's shipped and delayed work before accepting default throughput assumptions.
- Name each technical reviewer and estimate review passes before assigning publishing weeks.
- Validate anchors, mix, capacity, slots, and review rules separately, with explicit decisions at each stage.
Избегать
- Fill every week without reserving capacity for reactive work or delayed reviews.
- Treat repurposed assets, agency writing, or conference preparation as work that consumes no internal capacity.
- Present an evergreen ratio or one company's publishing output as a universal benchmark.
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Does this skill write the scheduled content?
What information should I provide first?
Can it review a calendar I already have?
Does 80/20 mean evergreen versus trending content?
Will it publish or synchronize my calendar?
Does it store planning context?
Сведения для разработчиков
Автор
samberЛицензия
MIT
Версия автора
v1.0.1
Ревизия Skillstore
r1
Ссылка
e7963efdc368d1561443c6903135858aa85494b1
Актуальность поддержки
25.10.2026
Использование
0 загрузок · 0 просмотров
Структура файлов