Навыки socratic-story-cartographer
📦

socratic-story-cartographer

v2.2 Ревизия содержимого r1 Безопасно 🌐 Доступ к сети📁 Доступ к файловой системе⚙️ Внешние команды

Diagnose Story Problems Before Revising

AI story feedback can repeat an unsupported diagnosis and encourage unnecessary changes. This skill tests competing explanations against textual evidence before recommending focused revisions.

Поддерживает: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Бронза

Установить с помощью моего Агента

Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.

Запрос агента
Review the Skillstore skill "socratic-story-cartographer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.

Ресурсы для AI-агентов

Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.

Markdown-детали GET /skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer.md Подписанный manifest GET /api/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/manifest Подписанный lockfile GET /api/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/lockfile

Протестировать

Использование «socratic-story-cartographer». Illustrative scene: A witness hides a letter, explains its contents to herself, then gives it to the detective without hesitation.

Ожидаемый результат:

  • Current belief: The handover lacks a consequential choice rather than an explanation of motive.
  • Evidence anchors: She initially hides the letter, but later gives it away without resistance or a new event.
  • Competing diagnosis: The explanatory passage may remove uncertainty before the handover.
  • Counterfactual test: Removing the explanation leaves the same unmotivated handover, so exposition alone does not explain the problem.
  • Minimal intervention: Establish one immediate cost that makes her decision to hand over the letter meaningful.
  • Protected quality: Keep her motives partly ambiguous rather than adding a complete explanation.

Использование «socratic-story-cartographer». Illustrative outline: Episode 2 contains an unsupported agreement that causes an episode 6 betrayal. Episode 5 and the ending are locked.

Ожидаемый результат:

  • Decision page: Recommend a structural revision proposal for human review, not production approval.
  • Issue route: The unsupported agreement begins in episode 2; its visible consequence is the betrayal in episode 6.
  • Revision range: Inspect episodes 2 through 6 instead of patching only the betrayal.
  • Task objective: Make the agreement depend on an observable pressure or choice.
  • Acceptance question: Does the revised agreement make the later betrayal causally understandable?
  • Stop line: Preserve episode 5 and the locked ending; do not introduce a new subplot.
  • Coverage limit: This brief supports a provisional route, not a complete season assessment.

Аудит безопасности

Безопасно
v1 • 09.11.2026 Открыть версионный отчет

All 50 static findings are false positives involving narrative terminology, Markdown formatting, installation documentation, a local reference link, and readable Chinese text. No evidence found of malicious prompt injection, data exfiltration, or hidden execution in the reviewed files. Installation examples are optional setup commands; promotion logs describe maintainer activity, not authorization for story reviewers to publish externally.

14
Просканировано файлов
2,277
Проанализировано строк
0
Пункты проверки
0
Ложные срабатывания проигнорированы

Факторы риска

🌐 Доступ к сети (6)
FIRST-TEST.md:8 PROMOTION_KIT.md:8 README.md:14 README.md:26 SKILL.md:19 SKILL.md:24
📁 Доступ к файловой системе (1)
references/BENCHMARK.md:14
⚙️ Внешние команды (16)
SKILL.md:18-20 SKILL.md:20-24 SKILL.md:24-28 SKILL.md:28-30 SKILL.md:30-32 SKILL.md:32 SKILL.md:82-83 SKILL.md:83-84 SKILL.md:84-85 SKILL.md:85-86 SKILL.md:86-87 SKILL.md:87-88 SKILL.md:88-109 SKILL.md:109-110 SKILL.md:110-276 SKILL.md:276-741
Последний завершенный статический и семантический аудит не обнаружил подтвержденных проблем безопасности. Это не доказывает отсутствие побочных эффектов у навыка.
Аудитор:: codex
Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет

Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.

Открыть версионный отчет
Оценка безопасности

Копировать ссылку на отчёт

https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Значок Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Значок HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Встраиваемая карточка

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Цитата APA

oakcoderx. (2026). socratic-story-cartographer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 2.2]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1

Цитата BibTeX

@techreport{oakcoderx-oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer-2026, author = {oakcoderx}, title = {socratic-story-cartographer security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1}, note = {Author version 2.2} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "socratic-story-cartographer security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "2.2" type: report authors: - name: "oakcoderx" date-released: "2026-11-09" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Оценка Skillstore

Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: Средний
59
Архитектура
85
Сопровождаемость
87
Контент
65
Сообщество
74
Соответствие спецификации

Что вы можете построить

Review a novel draft

Compare explanations for weak character agency across chapters while preserving voice and ambiguity.

Diagnose a screenplay scene

Check objectives, choices, and state changes before selecting the smallest useful scene revision.

Prepare a season revision handoff

Trace major outline problems to their first appearance and organize supported fixes into prioritized revision tasks.

Попробуйте эти промпты

Beginner: Diagnose one scene 
Review the scene below with Socratic Story Cartographer for one loop. Do not rewrite. Give textual evidence and the smallest useful next step. Scene: [text].
Intermediate: Test competing diagnoses 
Review this chapter for up to three loops. Compare two plausible causes of the main problem. Test both against textual evidence. Preserve ambiguity and voice. Do not rewrite yet. Chapter: [text].
Advanced: Verify a multi-file character arc 
Review these canonical chapter files using the long-work evidence protocol: [files]. Treat [older version] as non-canonical context. Track coverage and test whether the protagonist lacks agency. Inspect later choices before making work-wide claims. Disclose unread material and propose only supported changes.
Expert: Compile a producer review 
Review this season outline for up to three loops: [outline]. Apply long-work coverage before producer-outline review. Protect [scenes] and preserve [locked ending]. Do not rewrite or imply approval. Deliver a decision page, issue routes, hard errors, and dependency-ordered revision task cards. Include acceptance questions, stop lines, and the next human approval gate.

Лучшие практики

  • Provide the relevant canonical material, identify older versions, and state which files belong in the review.
  • Specify your goal, revision permission, protected qualities, and any locked scenes or endings.
  • Ask for competing explanations and evidence before accepting changes; allow early stopping when further loops add no information.

Избегать

  • Requesting a work-wide diagnosis from isolated excerpts without acknowledging unread material.
  • Treating author intent, model confidence, or benchmark scores as proof that a diagnosis is correct.
  • Requiring repeated rewrites despite weak evidence or treating an AI recommendation as human approval.

Часто задаваемые вопросы

Which AI tools can use this skill?
The skill is documented for compatible Agent Skills environments, including Claude Code and Codex. Installation and file access depend on the host environment.
Must every review run three loops?
No. Three loops is the default maximum. The skill should stop earlier when another loop adds no evidence or useful diagnostic change.
Will it rewrite my story automatically?
Revision requires your permission. You can request diagnosis only or allow limited edits while protecting specific story elements.
Can it review long manuscripts or multiple files?
It includes a source manifest and coverage ledger protocol. Conclusions must remain limited when files are inaccessible or reading coverage is incomplete.
Does it guarantee publication or production readiness?
No. It distinguishes text quality from target fit and uncertain acceptance. Human editorial, legal, and production decisions remain separate.
Does story review require external services?
No separate story-review service is specified. The documented installation command uses npm and GitHub; your AI host controls model access and data handling.

Сведения для разработчиков

Автор

oakcoderx

Лицензия

MIT

Версия автора

v2.2

Ревизия Skillstore

r1

Примечание о версии

Заявленная автором версия не соответствует SemVer.

Репозиторий

https://github.com/oakcoderx/awesome-agent-skills/tree/d19911ffc9fb075486e8b3e6d1f83817954290d5/socratic-story-cartographer

Ссылка

9938f91a9ab0f5763a54332b129295339bf829dd

Актуальность поддержки

09.11.2026

Использование

0 загрузок · 0 просмотров

Структура файлов

📄 AB-TEST.md

📄 BENCHMARK.md

📄 FIRST-TEST.md

📄 PROMOTION_KIT.md

📄 PROMOTION_LOG.md

📄 README.en.md

📄 README.md

📄 README.zh.md

📁 references/

📄 BENCHMARK.md

📄 long-work-evidence.md

📄 producer-outline-review.md

📄 promotion-review-2026-08-20.md

📄 skill.json

📄 SKILL.md

Связанные навыки

Показать все
📦

picture-book-wizard

90

Создание двуязычных книжек-картинок

от kart-io

Авторам нужны последовательные двуязычные книжки-картинки с учебными целями, учитывающими возраст. Этот skill создает страницы истории, китайско-английский текст и промпты для изображений на основе структурированных вариантов выбора.

Письмо и контент Просмотр
📦

content-creator

88

Создание SEO-контента с фирменным голосом бренда

от alirezarezvani

Маркетинговым командам нужен единообразный контент, который подходит для каждого канала и поддерживает поисковые цели. Этот skill объединяет рекомендации по фирменному голосу бренда, шаблоны контента, SEO-проверки и планирование социальных сетей.

Письмо и контент Просмотр
📦

viral-short-form

87

Создание коротких видео с высоким удержанием

от vyralcontent

Авторы часто теряют зрителей, потому что хуки слишком расплывчаты, а в сценариях нет четкой отдачи. Этот навык дает Claude, Codex и Claude Code структурированные паттерны для хуков, сценариев, каруселей и критики.

Письмо и контент Просмотр