История аудитов
kegg-database - 4 аудиты
Версия аудита 4
Последняя БезопасноJan 17, 2026, 06:01 AM
All 253 static findings are false positives. The scanner incorrectly flags Markdown backticks as Ruby shell execution, KEGG API URLs as suspicious network targets, and bioinformatics identifiers (pathway IDs, gene names) as weak crypto algorithms. This is a legitimate bioinformatics research tool that uses standard urllib for HTTP requests to the official KEGG REST API. No malicious code, command injection, or data exfiltration present.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (4)
🌐 Доступ к сети (3)
📁 Доступ к файловой системе (2)
Версия аудита 3
БезопасноJan 17, 2026, 06:01 AM
All 253 static findings are false positives. The scanner incorrectly flags Markdown backticks as Ruby shell execution, KEGG API URLs as suspicious network targets, and bioinformatics identifiers (pathway IDs, gene names) as weak crypto algorithms. This is a legitimate bioinformatics research tool that uses standard urllib for HTTP requests to the official KEGG REST API. No malicious code, command injection, or data exfiltration present.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (4)
🌐 Доступ к сети (3)
📁 Доступ к файловой системе (2)
Версия аудита 2
БезопасноJan 12, 2026, 04:35 PM
All 243 static findings are false positives. The scanner misinterprets markdown documentation (REST API syntax in code blocks) as shell command execution, and flags legitimate KEGG API URLs and standard urllib usage as network concerns. This is a genuine bioinformatics research tool with no malicious code.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (191)
🌐 Доступ к сети (19)
📁 Доступ к файловой системе (1)
Версия аудита 1
БезопасноJan 4, 2026, 04:42 PM
The code only performs HTTPS requests to the official KEGG REST endpoint (https://rest.kegg.jp) and returns response text. No sensitive file access, environment harvesting, or execution primitives were found. All network operations are legitimate API calls to a well-known bioinformatics database.