dbs-resonate
Diagnose Audience Resonance in Your Draft
A finished draft can contain clear ideas yet fail to connect with its intended audience. This skill locates specific resonance gaps and recommends focused edits using communication theory.
Установить с помощью моего Агента
Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.
Review the Skillstore skill "dbs-resonate" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.
Ресурсы для AI-агентов
Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.
Протестировать
Использование «dbs-resonate». Audience: first-time team leads. Draft: Everyone should communicate better. Good leaders are confident. Before assigning work, agree on the deadline and expected result.
Ожидаемый результат:
- Core issue: Broad advice obscures a useful action for first-time team leads.
- Central claim: Agree on deadlines and expected results before assigning work.
- Primary theory: Uses and gratifications. Practical usefulness is weak because generic claims delay the actionable guidance.
- Delete: 'Good leaders are confident.' It introduces a separate claim without support.
- Strengthen: Replace 'Everyone' with a concrete situation involving first-time team leads.
- Retain: The final sentence. Revised outline: assignment confusion, agreement on expectations, one practical example.
Использование «dbs-resonate». Audience: new freelancers. Draft: Late payments are frustrating. Clients are difficult. You should manage your business professionally.
Ожидаемый результат:
- Core issue: The draft names frustration without explaining its cause or giving readers control.
- Central claim: Unclear payment expectations can leave new freelancers uncertain about their next step.
- Primary theory: Emotional appraisal. The mechanism is weak because responsibility and control remain unspecified.
- Delete or qualify: 'Clients are difficult.' The draft provides no evidence for this generalization.
- Strengthen: Describe a specific unpaid invoice and clarify what action the freelancer can take.
- Revised outline: concrete payment problem, its effect on planning, one actionable response.
Аудит безопасности
БезопасноAll eight static findings are false positives: Markdown delimiters, local skill references, a scholarly DOI, and readable Chinese text. No evidence found of command execution, network transmission, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (4)
🌐 Доступ к сети (1)
Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет
Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.
Копировать ссылку на отчёт
https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportЗначок Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Значок HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Встраиваемая карточка
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Цитата APA
dontbesilent2025. (2026). dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1Цитата BibTeX
@techreport{dontbesilent2025-dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate-2026,
author = {dontbesilent2025},
title = {dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "dontbesilent2025"
date-released: "2026-10-28"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Оценка Skillstore
Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: СреднийЧто вы можете построить
Clarify a creator script
Locate vague audience references and competing claims in an existing video script, then prioritize concrete revisions.
Strengthen an educational article
Check whether an article gives readers a clear practical use and identify sentences that need stronger explanations.
Focus an organizational message
Review whether an internal draft connects employee concerns to one central claim and a clear intended action.
Попробуйте эти промпты
Review this draft for audience resonance: [draft]. Identify the central claim, quote the weakest passages, and suggest specific edits.
My audience is [audience], and I want them to [action]. Diagnose this draft: [draft]. Flag vague identity references and missing practical value.
Analyze [draft] for [audience]. Select one primary theory, quote supporting evidence, rate the mechanism, and explain missing conditions without predicting platform results.
Audit [draft] for [audience] seeking [action]. List claims and justify one primary theory. Provide deletion, compression, strengthening, retention, and one revised outline.
Лучшие практики
- Provide the complete draft, intended audience, and one desired audience response.
- Require quotations for each diagnosis and keep one primary theory unless separate evidence supports another.
- Apply focused edits first, then validate audience response through real feedback rather than assumed platform outcomes.
Избегать
- Requesting guaranteed virality, platform metrics, or commercial forecasts from a text diagnosis.
- Submitting only a topic and expecting a complete article or opening script.
- Adding emotional pressure or sharing triggers when the draft only needs to support understanding or saving.
Часто задаваемые вопросы
What should I provide?
Will it rewrite the entire draft?
Can it predict whether my content will go viral?
Which theories can guide the review?
Does the skill require network access or shell commands?
Can it explain why an already published post succeeded?
Сведения для разработчиков
Автор
dontbesilent2025Лицензия
MIT
Ревизия Skillstore
r1
Примечание о версии
Автор не указал версию.
Ссылка
8322ecc54632436d19d804491fe0bc4bbf7e1d32
Актуальность поддержки
28.10.2026
Использование
0 загрузок · 0 просмотров
Структура файлов