pricing-diagnostic
Diagnose Pricing Gaps Before Changing Prices
Pricing problems can come from weak demand evidence, misaligned billing units, or confusing tiers. This skill evaluates all three and recommends a focused next step.
Установить с помощью моего Агента
Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.
Review the Skillstore skill "pricing-diagnostic" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.
Ресурсы для AI-агентов
Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.
Протестировать
Использование «pricing-diagnostic». Illustrative case: research is absent, discounts exceed policy, billing aligns with value, and tested tiers are clear.
Ожидаемый результат:
- Willingness to pay: low. Main gaps are missing research and discounts above policy.
- Value metric: high. The supplied billing evidence aligns charges with customer value.
- Packaging: high. Tested differentiation supports the existing tiers.
- Triage: willingness-to-pay discovery before raising prices. Suggested timeline: about four weeks.
Использование «pricing-diagnostic». Illustrative case: recent segment research and billing alignment are strong, but 60% of buyers choose a confusing bottom tier.
Ожидаемый результат:
- Willingness to pay: high. Recent segment evidence supports the review.
- Value metric: high. Charges scale with customer success.
- Packaging: low. Tier confusion and buyer concentration suggest a packaging problem.
- Triage: packaging rebuild rather than a price change. Suggested timeline: about three weeks.
Аудит безопасности
БезопасноAll 23 static findings are false positives in the reviewed SKILL.md. Backticks format Markdown, parent-relative paths name documentation, and the reconnaissance match concerns customer billing behavior. No evidence found of executable commands, credential collection, data exfiltration, or prompt injection; referenced dependencies were not reviewed.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (17)
📁 Доступ к файловой системе (5)
Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет
Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.
Копировать ссылку на отчёт
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportЗначок Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Значок HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Встраиваемая карточка
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Цитата APA
cmj-hub. (2026). pricing-diagnostic security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic/audits/1Цитата BibTeX
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {pricing-diagnostic security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "pricing-diagnostic security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-pricing-diagnostic:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Оценка Skillstore
Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: СреднийЧто вы можете построить
Evaluate a Proposed Price Increase
Separate missing willingness-to-pay evidence from genuine pricing opportunities before deciding whether to raise prices.
Review Billing Metric Alignment
Investigate whether high-value customers pay proportionately and whether the current billing unit limits expansion.
Prioritize Tier Packaging Changes
Compare tier clarity, feature placement, and buyer distribution to determine whether packaging needs attention before price levels.
Попробуйте эти промпты
Diagnose my pricing using the attached tiers, billing metric, customer profiles, and discount policy. Identify missing evidence before scoring.
Review these segment close rates, discounts, and willingness-to-pay research. Score the three surfaces and explain whether more research should precede a price increase.
Use these usage ratios, customer payment ratios, tier features, and buyer distributions. Distinguish billing misalignment from packaging problems and prioritize the gaps.
Evaluate all supplied pricing evidence by customer profile. Explain each score, apply the triage matrix, name the next workflow, and estimate a timeline.
Лучшие практики
- Provide dated research and segment-level evidence alongside current tiers, billing units, customer profiles, and discount policy.
- Explain each score using supplied evidence and distinguish missing data from observed problems.
- Use the triage decision to prioritize investigation before implementing a material pricing change.
Избегать
- Inventing willingness-to-pay percentiles, close rates, or customer usage data to complete the report.
- Treating qualitative surface scores as precise forecasts of revenue or customer response.
- Raising prices when the evidence indicates a billing metric or packaging problem.