История аудитов

Static analysis reported command execution and weak-crypto patterns, but manual review found Markdown backticks, headings, and C# examples rather than executable shell or Ruby code. No prompt injection, secret exfiltration, network callback, or malicious intent was found. The remaining risk is normal filesystem access for reviewing and editing code.

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with .NET/C# coding guidelines. All 210 static findings are false positives caused by the scanner misidentifying markdown code blocks and C# method names as security threats. No executable code, network access, or external commands present.

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with .NET/C# coding guidelines. All 210 static findings are false positives caused by the scanner misidentifying markdown code blocks and C# method names as security threats. No executable code, network access, or external commands present.

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with .NET/C# coding guidelines. No executable code, no network access, no external commands. Uses standard development tools (Read, Edit, Grep, Glob) appropriate for code review tasks.

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with .NET/C# coding guidelines. No executable code, no network access, no external commands. Uses standard development tools (Read, Edit, Grep, Glob) appropriate for code review tasks.

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with .NET/C# coding guidelines. No executable code, no network access, no external commands. Uses standard development tools (Read, Edit, Grep, Glob) appropriate for code review tasks.