📦

agents-md-audit

Name: agents-md-audit
Author: agentkitco

v1.0 Ревизия содержимого r2 Безопасно ⚙️ Внешние команды

Audit Agent Instructions for Accuracy and Clarity

Stale commands, broken paths, and vague rules make agent instructions unreliable. This skill combines local heuristic checks with evidence-based review and proposes shorter instructions before approved edits.

Поддерживает: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 76 Адекватно

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 76 Адекватно

Установить с помощью моего Агента

Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.

Запрос агента

Review the Skillstore skill "agents-md-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.

Ресурсы для AI-агентов

Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.

Markdown-детали GET /skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit.md Подписанный manifest GET /api/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/manifest Подписанный lockfile GET /api/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/lockfile

Протестировать

Использование «agents-md-audit». Audit an instruction file containing a missing script reference and an obsolete directory.

Ожидаемый результат:

Must fix: The documented script has no matching definition in the repository manifest.
Must fix: The referenced directory does not exist at the documented location.
Not verified: Deployment was not run because it can change external state.
Proposed version: Remove obsolete references and retain verified instructions, pending owner approval.

Использование «agents-md-audit». Review a long instruction file with repeated rules and a possible secret.

Ожидаемый результат:

Must fix: A possible secret was detected. Its value is omitted; remove it and rotate it if real.
Should trim: A repeated rule duplicates an earlier instruction.
Should trim: Replace vague quality language with a testable requirement.
Proposed version: Keep unique hard constraints and move relevant rules into scoped files.

Аудит безопасности

Безопасно

v2 • 22.10.2026 Открыть версионный отчет

All 13 static findings are false positives involving regex literals, comments, Markdown formatting, dictionary access, or report placeholders. The checker reads local files and reports heuristics without executing extracted commands; the workflow separately permits safe command verification. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential extraction, or network exfiltration in the reviewed files.

Просканировано файлов

250

Проанализировано строк

Пункты проверки

Ложные срабатывания проигнорированы

Факторы риска

⚙️ Внешние команды (10)

scripts/audit_instructions.py:26 scripts/audit_instructions.py:27 scripts/audit_instructions.py:29 scripts/audit_instructions.py:98-147 scripts/audit_instructions.py:147-153 SKILL.md:16 SKILL.md:18 SKILL.md:19 SKILL.md:20 SKILL.md:31-49

Последний завершенный статический и семантический аудит не обнаружил подтвержденных проблем безопасности. Это не доказывает отсутствие побочных эффектов у навыка.

Аудитор:: codex Посмотреть историю аудитов →

Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет

Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.

Открыть версионный отчет

Копировать ссылку на отчёт

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Значок Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Значок HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Встраиваемая карточка

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Цитата APA

agentkitco. (2026). agents-md-audit security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2

Цитата BibTeX

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-agents-md-audit-2026,
  author = {agentkitco},
  title = {agents-md-audit security audit report (audit version 2)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {2},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2},
  note = {Author version 1.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "agents-md-audit security audit report (audit version 2)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "agentkitco"
date-released: "2026-10-22"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:agentkitco-agents-md-audit:audit:2"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Оценка Skillstore

Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: Средний

Архитектура

Сопровождаемость

Контент

Сообщество

Соответствие спецификации

Что вы можете построить

Refresh Repository Instructions

Find stale commands and missing paths after repository changes, then propose corrections with supporting evidence.

Reconcile Agent Rules

Compare instruction files for conflicting requirements and identify rules better suited to specific paths.

Review Instructions Before Sharing

Check for possible secrets, leftover placeholders, and unclear rules without repeating sensitive values in the report.

Попробуйте эти промпты

Review One Instruction File

Audit AGENTS.md for broken paths, vague wording, placeholders, and possible secrets. Report findings without editing files or running project commands.

Check Command References

Review CLAUDE.md command references against repository definitions. Identify missing scripts and targets, and mark commands you cannot safely verify.

Compare Instruction Files

Find repository agent instruction files. Compare their rules for contradictions, duplicates, and scope problems, citing file names and line numbers.

Prepare a Shorter Revision

Audit all discovered instruction files. Propose shorter versions that preserve hard constraints and incident-based rules. Wait for approval before editing.

Лучшие практики

Run the checker from the intended repository root and supply the instruction files explicitly.
Inspect project command definitions and use a trusted environment before running verification commands.
Require evidence for corrections, redact possible secrets, and approve proposed edits before applying them.

Избегать

Treating a clean heuristic report as proof that every instruction is correct.
Running deployment, migration, or deletion commands merely to verify documentation.
Removing incident-based rules or hard constraints solely to reduce file length.

Часто задаваемые вопросы

Which instruction formats can I review?

The workflow covers AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Claude rule files, Cursor rules, and GitHub Copilot instruction files.

Does the checker execute commands from instruction files?

No. It compares command references with local definitions. The separate review workflow permits safe verification commands and excludes deployment, migration, and deletion.

Does the skill edit files automatically?

The workflow requires an audit report and proposed revision, then waits for approval before editing.

What does the Python checker require?

It uses Python 3.8 or later and only standard-library modules. The instructions provide manual checking as a fallback.

Can it guarantee that no secrets remain?

No. It detects selected secret patterns. Review flagged values privately, omit them from reports, and rotate credentials when exposure is real.

How are contradictions and unclear rules handled?

The assistant reviews these manually, cites conflicting instructions, and proposes clearer wording. The script does not resolve semantic contradictions.