Навыки judge История аудитов
📦

История аудитов

judge - 4 аудиты

Версия аудита 4

Последняя Низкий риск

Jun 27, 2026, 03:39 PM

Static analysis found several high-risk patterns, but review shows they are false positives from Markdown formatting, rubric text, and placeholder labels. No evidence found for command execution, credential theft, weak cryptography, Windows SAM access, reconnaissance, network use, or prompt injection.

1
Просканировано файлов
178
Проанализировано строк
0
Review items
4
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (4)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Низкий
False Positive: Markdown Code Fence Flagged as Shell Execution
The external command finding at line 18 is a Markdown code fence that starts an output template. It does not instruct the model to run shell commands or execute backtick content.
The line contains only a Markdown fence marker for a formatted example. No command name, shell invocation, or user-controlled execution path is present.
Низкий
False Positive: Windows SAM Database Pattern
The sensitive-file findings at lines 100 and 103 are placeholder text inside a scoring template. They do not reference Windows paths, registry hives, hashes, or credential files.
The matching text is bracketed placeholder language for repeated sections. There is no semantic evidence of Windows SAM access or credential extraction.
Низкий
False Positive: Weak Cryptography Pattern
The weak-cryptography findings are triggered by ordinary words in the description and rubric. The skill contains no hashing algorithm use, encryption code, or security-sensitive cryptographic guidance.
The referenced lines discuss implementation labels, design adherence, and scoring context. No cryptographic primitive or implementation is present.
Низкий
False Positive: System Reconnaissance Pattern
The reconnaissance finding at line 128 appears in a prompt placeholder asking for trade-offs between implementations. It does not request host, network, account, or environment enumeration.
The line asks what alternate implementations did better as part of a comparison rubric. It is unrelated to system discovery or operational reconnaissance.
Проблем безопасности не найдено
Аудитор:: codex

Версия аудита 3

Безопасно

Jan 16, 2026, 01:49 PM

This skill is a pure markdown documentation file containing only scoring instructions. No executable code exists in the skill. All 24 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES - the static scanner misidentified plain text in JSON metadata and markdown documentation as security vulnerabilities. There is no network access, file system operations, or command execution capability. The skill only provides structured prompts for AI-assisted code evaluation.

2
Просканировано файлов
351
Проанализировано строк
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Факторы риска

⚙️ Внешние команды (1)
Аудитор:: claude

Версия аудита 2

Безопасно

Jan 16, 2026, 01:49 PM

This skill is a pure markdown documentation file containing only scoring instructions. No executable code exists in the skill. All 24 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES - the static scanner misidentified plain text in JSON metadata and markdown documentation as security vulnerabilities. There is no network access, file system operations, or command execution capability. The skill only provides structured prompts for AI-assisted code evaluation.

2
Просканировано файлов
351
Проанализировано строк
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Факторы риска

⚙️ Внешние команды (1)
Аудитор:: claude

Версия аудита 1

Безопасно

Jan 10, 2026, 09:25 AM

Pure prompt-based skill with no executable code. Contains only markdown instructions for AI scoring framework. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities.

1
Просканировано файлов
178
Проанализировано строк
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Проблем безопасности не найдено
Аудитор:: claude