История аудитов
judge - 4 аудиты
Версия аудита 4
Последняя Низкий рискJun 27, 2026, 03:39 PM
Static analysis found several high-risk patterns, but review shows they are false positives from Markdown formatting, rubric text, and placeholder labels. No evidence found for command execution, credential theft, weak cryptography, Windows SAM access, reconnaissance, network use, or prompt injection.
Static false positives ignored (4)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Версия аудита 3
БезопасноJan 16, 2026, 01:49 PM
This skill is a pure markdown documentation file containing only scoring instructions. No executable code exists in the skill. All 24 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES - the static scanner misidentified plain text in JSON metadata and markdown documentation as security vulnerabilities. There is no network access, file system operations, or command execution capability. The skill only provides structured prompts for AI-assisted code evaluation.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (1)
Версия аудита 2
БезопасноJan 16, 2026, 01:49 PM
This skill is a pure markdown documentation file containing only scoring instructions. No executable code exists in the skill. All 24 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES - the static scanner misidentified plain text in JSON metadata and markdown documentation as security vulnerabilities. There is no network access, file system operations, or command execution capability. The skill only provides structured prompts for AI-assisted code evaluation.
Факторы риска
⚙️ Внешние команды (1)
Версия аудита 1
БезопасноJan 10, 2026, 09:25 AM
Pure prompt-based skill with no executable code. Contains only markdown instructions for AI scoring framework. No filesystem access, network calls, or command execution capabilities.