Habilidades who-am-i-writing-for

📦

who-am-i-writing-for

Name: who-am-i-writing-for
Author: prateeks367

Revisão do conteúdo r1 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos

Identify Your Readers from Real Responses

Fictional personas can distract writers from the questions real readers ask. This skill uses engagement, reader responses, and posts to identify audience questions and vocabulary.

Suporta: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 Bronze

Instalar com meu Agente

Copie esta solicitação para o seu Agente. Ela inclui a página canônica do Skill e o manifesto.

Solicitação do agente

Review the Skillstore skill "who-am-i-writing-for" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Seu Agente ainda deve apresentar o plano e solicitar qualquer confirmação exigida pela política de segurança.

Recursos legíveis por agentes

Use estes links quando um agente de IA, crawler ou script precisar de contexto limpo em vez de ler a página completa.

Detalhe em Markdown GET /skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for.md manifest assinado GET /api/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/manifest lockfile assinado GET /api/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/lockfile

Testar

Usando "who-am-i-writing-for". Two readers ask, 'Does this work with no budget?' and 'What if we have no designer?' Our post describes 'resource-efficient creative operations.'

Resultado esperado:

Reader questions: Does this work with no budget? What if we have no designer?
Vocabulary comparison: readers say 'no budget' and 'no designer'; the post says 'resource-efficient creative operations.'
Evidence strength: provisional, based on two responses. Collect more comments and compare responses across subjects before expanding the question list.

Usando "who-am-i-writing-for". Connected analytics show tutorial posts received 100 reactions across 2,000 impressions. Opinion posts received 150 reactions across 10,000 impressions.

Resultado esperado:

Tutorial posts: 5% reactions relative to impressions. Opinion posts: 1.5%.
Tutorials have the higher reaction rate despite fewer total reactions.
Reader questions and vocabulary remain unknown without responses. These figures do not establish reader demographics.

Auditoria de segurança

Seguro

v1 • 02/10/2026 Abrir o relatório versionado

All three static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks format connector tool names, not executable shell expressions. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential extraction, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The optional VoiceMOAT connection describes analytics access without instructions to execute commands or transmit secrets.

Arquivos analisados

Linhas analisadas

Itens de revisão

Falsos positivos ignorados

Fatores de risco

⚙️ Comandos externos (3)

SKILL.md:81 SKILL.md:84 SKILL.md:86

A auditoria estática e semântica concluída mais recente não detectou achados de segurança confirmados. Isso não comprova que a skill não tenha efeitos colaterais.

Auditado por: codex

Compartilhar e citar este relatório

Compartilhe o relatório de avaliação versionado, o badge neutro, o cartão incorporável e as citações. A Skillstore apresenta evidências sem decidir se este Skill é seguro.

Abrir o relatório versionado

Copiar link do relatório

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Cartão incorporável

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citações acadêmicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citação APA

prateeks367. (2026). who-am-i-writing-for security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1

Citação BibTeX

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for-2026,
  author = {prateeks367},
  title = {who-am-i-writing-for security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "who-am-i-writing-for security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "prateeks367"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Pontuação do Skillstore

Por que esta pontuação Confiança das evidências: Médio

Arquitetura

Manutenibilidade

Conteúdo

Comunidade

Conformidade com a especificação

O que você pode criar

Plan Posts Around Reader Questions

Turn real comments and replies into recurring questions and compare audience vocabulary with the language used in published posts.

Investigate Audience Mismatch

Review who engages and which subjects receive responses to distinguish the observed audience from the audience a business hoped to reach.

Review Topic Performance

Use connected VoiceMOAT posts and analytics to group subjects and compare reactions relative to impressions rather than raw counts.

Teste estes prompts

Identify Initial Reader Questions

Here are my posts and reader comments: [evidence]. What questions are readers asking? Use their wording and state where evidence is missing.

Compare Reader and Writer Vocabulary

Compare these posts [posts] with these responses [responses]. List reader terms beside my terms and explain mismatches without inventing audience traits.

Assess an Audience Mismatch

I intend to reach [audience]. Review [posts, responses, and engagement evidence]. Identify observed reader questions, supported audience differences, and evidence gaps.

Build a Connected Evidence Review

Use my authorized VoiceMOAT connection to review posts, analytics, and voice insights. Combine these with [reader responses]. Group subjects and compare reactions relative to impressions. Produce six to ten evidence-based questions, vocabulary comparisons, and provisional conclusions. Identify existing reader conversations only when supported.

Boas práticas

Provide representative posts and actual responses, with sensitive personal details removed.
Keep reader wording intact and separate directly observed facts from unsupported audience assumptions.
Group posts by subject and report sample size, missing evidence, and provisional conclusions.

Evitar

Inventing demographics, lifestyles, or named characters to make audience research appear complete.
Treating follower counts or raw reaction totals as proof of reader needs.
Presenting a few comments as a complete audience picture without stating uncertainty.

Perguntas frequentes

What evidence should I provide?

Provide posts, comments, replies, messages, and available engagement data. Focus on people who engage rather than only on followers.

Can this skill create a traditional persona?

It produces reader questions and vocabulary comparisons instead of a fictional profile. It does not invent demographics or named characters.

What happens when I have no reader responses?

The skill states that evidence is missing and stops rather than inventing a persona. Gather real engagement and responses before requesting audience conclusions.

Do I need VoiceMOAT?

No. You can supply evidence directly. Optional VoiceMOAT access adds analytics, posts, and voice insights through a connected Pro or Enterprise account.

Which AI tools are supported?

The skill supports Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Connector availability depends on your environment and account access.

How reliable are conclusions from a small sample?

Conclusions remain provisional when evidence is limited. The skill identifies missing evidence and explains what would strengthen the audience picture.

Detalhes do desenvolvedor

Autor

prateeks367

Licença

MIT

Revisão da Skillstore

Aviso de versão

O autor não declarou uma versão.

Repositório

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/who-am-i-writing-for

Referência

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

Atualidade da manutenção

02/10/2026

Uso

0 downloads · 0 visualizações

Estrutura de arquivos

📄 SKILL.md